OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch couldn't compile. I assume you post a wrong patch...?
^
version
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe
"Machida, Hiroyuki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a revised version of dirent scan patch, mentioned at
> following E-mail.
>
> This patch addresses performance damages on "ls | xargs xxx" and
> reverse order scan which are reported to the previous patch.
>
> With this patch,
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:55:46AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some more.
>
> On 8/30/05, Machida, Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- old/fs/fat/inode.c 2005-08-29 09:38:53.308587787 +0900
> > +++ new/fs/fat/inode.c 2005-08-29 09:39:33.889555606 +0900
> > @@ -345,6 +347,15 @@
Hi,
Some more.
On 8/30/05, Machida, Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- old/fs/fat/inode.c 2005-08-29 09:38:53.308587787 +0900
> +++ new/fs/fat/inode.c 2005-08-29 09:39:33.889555606 +0900
> @@ -345,6 +347,15 @@ static void fat_delete_inode(struct inod
> static void
Hi,
Some coding style nitpicks.
On 8/30/05, Machida, Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +inline
> +static int hint_allocate(struct inode *dir)
> +{
> + void *hints;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (!MSDOS_I(dir)->scan_hints) {
> + hints =
Hi,
Some coding style nitpicks.
On 8/30/05, Machida, Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+inline
+static int hint_allocate(struct inode *dir)
+{
+ void *hints;
+ int err = 0;
+
+ if (!MSDOS_I(dir)-scan_hints) {
+ hints =
Hi,
Some more.
On 8/30/05, Machida, Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- old/fs/fat/inode.c 2005-08-29 09:38:53.308587787 +0900
+++ new/fs/fat/inode.c 2005-08-29 09:39:33.889555606 +0900
@@ -345,6 +347,15 @@ static void fat_delete_inode(struct inod
static void fat_clear_inode(struct
On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 11:55:46AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hi,
Some more.
On 8/30/05, Machida, Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- old/fs/fat/inode.c 2005-08-29 09:38:53.308587787 +0900
+++ new/fs/fat/inode.c 2005-08-29 09:39:33.889555606 +0900
@@ -345,6 +347,15 @@ static void
Machida, Hiroyuki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a revised version of dirent scan patch, mentioned at
following E-mail.
This patch addresses performance damages on ls | xargs xxx and
reverse order scan which are reported to the previous patch.
With this patch, fat_search_long() and
OGAWA Hirofumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch couldn't compile. I assume you post a wrong patch...?
^
version
--
OGAWA Hirofumi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
10 matches
Mail list logo