Re: [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

2007-03-19 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:13 +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote: > That requires changes in Linux-generic files. The default of timer_irq is 0, > so > the patch doesn't break i386/x86_64. However, other platforms also may also > have a timer interrupt non-equal to zero, so they can also use the new >

Re: [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

2007-03-19 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On IA64, the timer interrupt is not (always?) zero as it is on x86 platforms. Also, the timer interrupt is CPU-local. Two things need to be changed to make the irqpoll option make also working on IA64: o Call note_interrupt() also on

Re: [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

2007-03-19 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 19/03/07, Bernhard Walle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On IA64, the timer interrupt is not (always?) zero as it is on x86 platforms. Also, the timer interrupt is CPU-local. Two things need to be changed to make the irqpoll option make also working on IA64: o Call note_interrupt() also on

Re: [PATCH] [REVIEW] Fix irqpoll on IA64 (timer interrupt != 0)

2007-03-19 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 19:13 +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote: That requires changes in Linux-generic files. The default of timer_irq is 0, so the patch doesn't break i386/x86_64. However, other platforms also may also have a timer interrupt non-equal to zero, so they can also use the new