On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 00:30 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> */
> smp_wmb();
> - atomic_set(>ct_general.use, 1);
> + atomic_set(>ct_general.use, 0);
> return ct;
Hi Pablo !
I think your patch is the way to go, but might need some extra care
with memory
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:30:46AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > > > I think it would be nice if we could keep it that way.
> > > > If everything fails we could proably intoduce a 'larval' dummy list
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 12:30:46AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
Andrew Vagin ava...@parallels.com wrote:
I think it would be nice if we could keep it that way.
If everything fails we could proably intoduce a 'larval'
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 00:30 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
*/
smp_wmb();
- atomic_set(ct-ct_general.use, 1);
+ atomic_set(ct-ct_general.use, 0);
return ct;
Hi Pablo !
I think your patch is the way to go, but might need some extra care
with memory
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > > I think it would be nice if we could keep it that way.
> > > If everything fails we could proably intoduce a 'larval' dummy list
> > > similar to the one used by template conntracks?
> >
> > I'm not
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:23:01AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
Andrew Vagin ava...@parallels.com wrote:
I think it would be nice if we could keep it that way.
If everything fails we could proably intoduce a 'larval' dummy list
similar to the one used by template conntracks?
I'm
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:35:48PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>
> Eric and Florian, could you look at this patch. When you say,
> that it looks good, I will ask the user to validate it.
> I can't reorder these actions, because it's reproduced on a real host
> with real users. Thanks.
We
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:35:48PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
Eric and Florian, could you look at this patch. When you say,
that it looks good, I will ask the user to validate it.
I can't reorder these actions, because it's reproduced on a real host
with real users. Thanks.
We didn't
Andrew Vagin wrote:
> > I think it would be nice if we could keep it that way.
> > If everything fails we could proably intoduce a 'larval' dummy list
> > similar to the one used by template conntracks?
>
> I'm not sure, that this is required. Could you elaborate when this can
> be useful?
You
Andrew Vagin ava...@parallels.com wrote:
I think it would be nice if we could keep it that way.
If everything fails we could proably intoduce a 'larval' dummy list
similar to the one used by template conntracks?
I'm not sure, that this is required. Could you elaborate when this can
be
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:53:29PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Andrey Vagin wrote:
> >
> > Eric and Florian, could you look at this patch. When you say,
> > that it looks good, I will ask the user to validate it.
> > I can't reorder these actions, because it's reproduced on a real host
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:53:29PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
Andrey Vagin ava...@openvz.org wrote:
Eric and Florian, could you look at this patch. When you say,
that it looks good, I will ask the user to validate it.
I can't reorder these actions, because it's reproduced on a
Andrey Vagin wrote:
>
> Eric and Florian, could you look at this patch. When you say,
> that it looks good, I will ask the user to validate it.
> I can't reorder these actions, because it's reproduced on a real host
> with real users. Thanks.
>
>
> nf_conntrack_free can't be called for
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:35:48PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
>
> Eric and Florian, could you look at this patch. When you say,
> that it looks good, I will ask the user to validate it.
> I can't reorder these actions, because it's reproduced on a real host
> with real users. Thanks.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:35:48PM +0400, Andrey Vagin wrote:
Eric and Florian, could you look at this patch. When you say,
that it looks good, I will ask the user to validate it.
I can't reorder these actions, because it's reproduced on a real host
with real users. Thanks.
Andrey Vagin ava...@openvz.org wrote:
Eric and Florian, could you look at this patch. When you say,
that it looks good, I will ask the user to validate it.
I can't reorder these actions, because it's reproduced on a real host
with real users. Thanks.
nf_conntrack_free can't be
16 matches
Mail list logo
