On 08/03/2019 16.53, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 09:09:46AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On 08/03/2019 08.01, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> Mathematical therm for discrete numbers greater or equal to zero is
>>> "normal numbers".
>>
>> Sorry, WHAT? "Normal" is used and
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 09:09:46AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 08/03/2019 08.01, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > Mathematical therm for discrete numbers greater or equal to zero is
> > "normal numbers".
>
> Sorry, WHAT? "Normal" is used and abused for a lot of things in
> mathematics, but I
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 08:58:21AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 08/03/2019 01.08, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 08:18 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> >> On 07/03/2019 03.14, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >>> On 3/6/19 5:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > diff --git
On 08/03/2019 08.01, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> Mathematical therm for discrete numbers greater or equal to zero is
> "normal numbers".
Sorry, WHAT? "Normal" is used and abused for a lot of things in
mathematics, but I have never heard it used that way. When attached to
the word "number", it
On 08/03/2019 01.08, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 08:18 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> On 07/03/2019 03.14, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 3/6/19 5:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h
> index
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:28:45PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 07/03/2019 18.12, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:02 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:52:51AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:40 AM Leon Romanovsky
> >>>
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 04:08:23PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 08:18 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > On 07/03/2019 03.14, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On 3/6/19 5:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h
On Thu, 2019-03-07 at 08:18 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 07/03/2019 03.14, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 3/6/19 5:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h
> > > > index 40b48e2133cb..8afe0c0ada6f 100644
> > > > +++
On 07/03/2019 18.12, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:02 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:52:51AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:40 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 06:53:54AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:12:40AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:02 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:52:51AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:40 AM Leon Romanovsky
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:02 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:52:51AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:40 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 06:53:54AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > > On 3/6/19 11:24 PM, Leon Romanovsky
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:52:51AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:40 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 06:53:54AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > On 3/6/19 11:24 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > My simple patch passes too :).
> > >
> > > Can you
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 7:40 AM Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 06:53:54AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 3/6/19 11:24 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > My simple patch passes too :).
> >
> > Can you repost your patch?
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10841079/
>
> As
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 06:53:54AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 3/6/19 11:24 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > My simple patch passes too :).
>
> Can you repost your patch?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10841079/
As Rasmus wrote, the thing is to avoid a < 0 check. In my patch,
I
On 3/6/19 11:24 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
My simple patch passes too :).
Can you repost your patch?
Thanks,
Bart.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 06:14:09PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 3/6/19 5:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:01:53PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > This patch avoids that the following warning is reported when building
> > > the mlx5 driver with W=1:
> > >
> > >
On 07/03/2019 03.14, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 3/6/19 5:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/overflow.h b/include/linux/overflow.h
>>> index 40b48e2133cb..8afe0c0ada6f 100644
>>> +++ b/include/linux/overflow.h
>>> @@ -202,6 +202,24 @@
>>> #endif /*
On 3/6/19 5:24 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:01:53PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
This patch avoids that the following warning is reported when building
the mlx5 driver with W=1:
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c: In function set_user_rq_size:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 05:01:53PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch avoids that the following warning is reported when building
> the mlx5 driver with W=1:
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/qp.c: In function set_user_rq_size:
> ./include/linux/overflow.h:230:6: warning: comparison of
19 matches
Mail list logo