On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:34:15PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
> ignore useless 'modalias' values in cases like this:
>
> // modalias = "shinynewdevice"
> compatible = "myvendor,shinynewdevice", "jedec,spi-nor";
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 06:34:15PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
ignore useless 'modalias' values in cases like this:
// modalias = shinynewdevice
compatible = myvendor,shinynewdevice, jedec,spi-nor;
and
On 21 May 2015 at 11:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 21 May 2015 at 10:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing
On 21 May 2015 at 11:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 21 May 2015 at 10:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing
Hi Rafal,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 21 May 2015 at 10:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing "spi-nor"
>> from m25p_ids[] nor from this
On 21 May 2015 at 10:58, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing "spi-nor"
> from m25p_ids[] nor from this block:
>
> if (data && data->type)
>
Hi Rafal,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing "spi-nor"
from m25p_ids[] nor from this block:
if (data && data->type)
flash_name = data->type;
else if
On 21 May 2015 at 10:39, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Rafal, Brian,
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 21 May 2015 at 10:15, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris wrote:
Hi Rafal, Brian,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 21 May 2015 at 10:15, Brian Norris wrote:
>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> >> > For platform devices, you might as well just use
On 21 May 2015 at 10:15, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > (trim CC a bit, as this is no longer a DT binding question)
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris wrote:
> > (trim CC a bit, as this is no longer a DT binding question)
> >
> > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian Norris wrote:
>
On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris wrote:
> (trim CC a bit, as this is no longer a DT binding question)
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> >>
(trim CC a bit, as this is no longer a DT binding question)
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> >
On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
>> > ignore useless 'modalias' values in cases like this:
>>
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
(trim CC a bit, as this is no longer a DT binding question)
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian
On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
(trim CC a bit, as this is no longer a DT binding question)
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at
On 21 May 2015 at 10:15, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
(trim CC a bit, as this is no longer a DT binding question)
On Thu, May 21, 2015
Hi Rafal, Brian,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 10:15, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 09:25, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com
(trim CC a bit, as this is no longer a DT binding question)
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian
On 20 May 2015 at 23:35, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
ignore
On 21 May 2015 at 10:58, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing spi-nor
from m25p_ids[] nor from this block:
if (data data-type)
On 21 May 2015 at 10:39, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Rafal, Brian,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 10:15, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki
Hi Rafal,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing spi-nor
from m25p_ids[] nor from this block:
if (data data-type)
flash_name = data-type;
else if
Hi Rafal,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 10:58, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
I think your comments suggest that I shouldn't be removing spi-nor
On 21 May 2015 at 11:39, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 10:58, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On 21 May 2015 at 11:39, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 10:58, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Rafał Miłecki zaj...@gmail.com wrote:
I
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian Norris wrote:
> > So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
> > ignore useless 'modalias' values in cases like this:
> >
> > // modalias = "shinynewdevice"
> >
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:27:50AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
ignore useless 'modalias' values in cases like this:
// modalias =
On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian Norris wrote:
> So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
> ignore useless 'modalias' values in cases like this:
>
> // modalias = "shinynewdevice"
> compatible = "myvendor,shinynewdevice", "jedec,spi-nor";
>
> and also
On 19 May 2015 at 03:34, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
So how about the following patch? It seems like we'll need to be able to
ignore useless 'modalias' values in cases like this:
// modalias = shinynewdevice
compatible = myvendor,shinynewdevice,
Hi Geert,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:51:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Brian Norris
> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> > It really helps if I
Hi Brian,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Brian Norris
wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
>> > It really helps if I test patches...
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Brian
+ linux-spi
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
> > It really helps if I test patches...
> >
> > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
[...]
> > > @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static const
On 05/15/2015 02:02 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:26:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 05/14/2015 11:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 ("Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add
"nor-jedec"
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
> It really helps if I test patches...
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 ("Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add "nor-jedec"
> > binding"), we added a generic "nor-jedec"
On 05/15/2015 02:02 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:26:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 05/14/2015 11:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 (Documentation: devicetree: m25p80:
Hi Brian,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
It really helps if I test patches...
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:32:53AM
+ linux-spi
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
It really helps if I test patches...
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
[...]
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static const struct
Hi Geert,
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:51:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Brian Norris
computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
It
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 08:55:41PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
It really helps if I test patches...
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 (Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add nor-jedec
binding), we added a generic nor-jedec binding to catch
On 15 May 2015 at 22:02, Brian Norris wrote:
> Thanks all. I see that I've gotten an ack from Mark as well (thanks!),
> so I'll apply this (plus the fixup I just sent) to linux-mtd.git and
> probably pullreq it before the weekend is over. I'll assume Rafal and
> Geert will take care of following
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:26:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 05/14/2015 11:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
> >> In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 ("Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add
> >> "nor-jedec"
> >> binding"), we added a generic
It really helps if I test patches...
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 ("Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add "nor-jedec"
> binding"), we added a generic "nor-jedec" binding to catch all
> mostly-compatible SPI NOR flash which can be detected
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:32:53PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
> In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 ("Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add "nor-jedec"
> binding"), we added a generic "nor-jedec" binding to catch all
> mostly-compatible SPI NOR flash which can be detected via the READ ID
> opcode (0x9F). This
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 06:32:53PM +0100, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 (Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add nor-jedec
binding), we added a generic nor-jedec binding to catch all
mostly-compatible SPI NOR flash which can be detected via the READ ID
opcode (0x9F). This was
It really helps if I test patches...
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:32:53AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 (Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add nor-jedec
binding), we added a generic nor-jedec binding to catch all
mostly-compatible SPI NOR flash which can be detected via the
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:26:41PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 05/14/2015 11:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 (Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add
nor-jedec
binding), we added a
On 15 May 2015 at 22:02, Brian Norris computersforpe...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks all. I see that I've gotten an ack from Mark as well (thanks!),
so I'll apply this (plus the fixup I just sent) to linux-mtd.git and
probably pullreq it before the weekend is over. I'll assume Rafal and
Geert will
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 05/14/2015 11:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
>> In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 ("Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add
>> "nor-jedec"
>> binding"), we added a generic "nor-jedec" binding to catch all
>> mostly-compatible SPI NOR flash which can be
On 05/14/2015 11:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 ("Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add "nor-jedec"
binding"), we added a generic "nor-jedec" binding to catch all
mostly-compatible SPI NOR flash which can be detected via the READ ID
opcode (0x9F). This was discussed and
On 05/14/2015 11:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 (Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add nor-jedec
binding), we added a generic nor-jedec binding to catch all
mostly-compatible SPI NOR flash which can be detected via the READ ID
opcode (0x9F). This was discussed and reviewed at
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 05/14/2015 11:32 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
In commit 8ff16cf77ce3 (Documentation: devicetree: m25p80: add
nor-jedec
binding), we added a generic nor-jedec binding to catch all
mostly-compatible SPI NOR flash which
52 matches
Mail list logo
