On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 09:24:06PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Is that with just the code movement patch or your feature patch
> > added too? If the later can you test it with only code movement
> > (and compare against vanilla ke
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:07:48PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Is that with just the code movement patch or your feature patch
> added too? If the later can you test it with only code movement
> (and compare against vanilla kernel). at least code movement
> only should behave exactly the same as unp
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 08:03:01PM +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 08:28:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:15, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > > Ok, here you go, what about that? I'll be able to test it on i386 on
> > > monday, not before. It's h
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 08:28:04PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:15, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > Ok, here you go, what about that? I'll be able to test it on i386 on
> > monday, not before. It's hard to doa full 32bits install remotely :-)
>
> Sorry, please don't put i
On Sunday 26 November 2006 14:15, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> Ok, here you go, what about that? I'll be able to test it on i386 on
> monday, not before. It's hard to doa full 32bits install remotely :-)
Sorry, please don't put it all into a single patch. Do one patch
that just moves code, then add
Ok, here you go, what about that? I'll be able to test it on i386 on
monday, not before. It's hard to doa full 32bits install remotely :-)
OG.
>From 9703313602daaac65e41210444b2ce20b6e340b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Olivier Galibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:10:09 +01
6 matches
Mail list logo
