On 08/28/2018 04:18 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:10:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM
On 08/28/2018 04:18 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:10:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM
Em Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:10:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > >> The patch
Em Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:10:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> > >> The patch
Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> from:
> 0.26 │ → callq *8
> to:
> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only address.
>
Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> from:
> 0.26 │ → callq *8
> to:
> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only address.
>
Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> >> The patch changes interpretation of:
> >> callq *0x8(%rbx)
> >>
> >> from:
> >> 0.26 │ → callq
Em Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:06:21AM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> >> The patch changes interpretation of:
> >> callq *0x8(%rbx)
> >>
> >> from:
> >> 0.26 │ → callq
On 08/27/2018 12:37 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> The patch changes interpretation of:
>> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>>
>> from:
>> 0.26 │ → callq *8
>> to:
>> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>>
>> in this can an address is
On 08/27/2018 12:37 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> The patch changes interpretation of:
>> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>>
>> from:
>> 0.26 │ → callq *8
>> to:
>> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>>
>> in this can an address is
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> from:
> 0.26 │ → callq *8
> to:
> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> from:
> 0.26 │ → callq *8
> to:
> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only
On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
>> The patch changes interpretation of:
>> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>>
>> from:
>> 0.26 │ → callq *8
>> to:
>> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>>
>> in this can an address is
On 08/23/2018 04:12 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
>> The patch changes interpretation of:
>> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>>
>> from:
>> 0.26 │ → callq *8
>> to:
>> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>>
>> in this can an address is
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:29:34 +0200
Martin Liška wrote:
> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> from:
> 0.26 │ → callq *8
> to:
> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only address.
>
>
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:29:34 +0200
Martin Liška wrote:
> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> from:
> 0.26 │ → callq *8
> to:
> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only address.
>
>
Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> from:
> 0.26 │ → callq *8
> to:
> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only address.
Em Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 02:29:34PM +0200, Martin Liška escreveu:
> The patch changes interpretation of:
> callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> from:
> 0.26 │ → callq *8
> to:
> 0.26 │ → callq *0x8(%rbx)
>
> in this can an address is followed by a register, thus
> one can't parse only address.
18 matches
Mail list logo