On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:13:01PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> So, there are 2 different problems here:
> 1/ the board no longer boots because of commit 87248991a1de and a
>missing entry in the voltage table
> 2/ claiming the PWM pins at probe time can cause glitches
> I'm currently
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 08:13:01PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> So, there are 2 different problems here:
> 1/ the board no longer boots because of commit 87248991a1de and a
>missing entry in the voltage table
> 2/ claiming the PWM pins at probe time can cause glitches
> I'm currently
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:47:52 +0100
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 05:12:17PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > +Mark
>
> > I realize Mark has been out of the discussion, and what started as a DT
> > problem actually turned into a PWM regulator discussion.
> >
On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:47:52 +0100
Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 05:12:17PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > +Mark
>
> > I realize Mark has been out of the discussion, and what started as a DT
> > problem actually turned into a PWM regulator discussion.
> > Maybe we should
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 05:12:17PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> +Mark
> I realize Mark has been out of the discussion, and what started as a DT
> problem actually turned into a PWM regulator discussion.
> Maybe we should start a new thread.
Probably, you're lucky I even looked at this - the
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 05:12:17PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> +Mark
> I realize Mark has been out of the discussion, and what started as a DT
> problem actually turned into a PWM regulator discussion.
> Maybe we should start a new thread.
Probably, you're lucky I even looked at this - the
+Mark
I realize Mark has been out of the discussion, and what started as a DT
problem actually turned into a PWM regulator discussion.
Maybe we should start a new thread.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:15:06 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:43 PM,
+Mark
I realize Mark has been out of the discussion, and what started as a DT
problem actually turned into a PWM regulator discussion.
Maybe we should start a new thread.
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 14:15:06 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Boris Brezillon
>
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:12:12 -0700
> Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
>> wrote:
>> >
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:12:12 -0700
> Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
>> > Doug Anderson wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:12:12 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
> > Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
>
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:12:12 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
> > Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Boris Brezillon
> >> wrote:
> >> > The PWM
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:12:12 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
> > Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
>
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:12:12 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
> > Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Boris Brezillon
> >> wrote:
> >> > The PWM
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
> Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Boris Brezillon
>> wrote:
>>
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
> Doug Anderson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Boris Brezillon
>> wrote:
>> > The PWM chip has always claimed the pins and muxed them to the PWM IP.
>> > So, this means
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > The PWM chip has always claimed the pins and muxed them to the PWM IP.
> > So, this means it's broken from
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:52:51 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > The PWM chip has always claimed the pins and muxed them to the PWM IP.
> > So, this means it's broken from the beginning, and my patch is only
> > uncovering the
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> The PWM chip has always claimed the pins and muxed them to the PWM IP.
> So, this means it's broken from the beginning, and my patch is only
> uncovering the problem (unless the pins stay
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> The PWM chip has always claimed the pins and muxed them to the PWM IP.
> So, this means it's broken from the beginning, and my patch is only
> uncovering the problem (unless the pins stay configured as input until
> the PWM is
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:43 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the main problem here is that, when we try
> > to detect the initial
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:43 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the main problem here is that, when we try
> > to detect the initial regulator state, we ran into a "missing entry in
> > the duty-cycle
Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 19:13:27 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:38:34 -0700
>
> Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 08:15:30 CEST
Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 19:13:27 CEST schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:38:34 -0700
>
> Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 08:15:30 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:38:34 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 08:15:30 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andy
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:38:34 -0700
Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 08:15:30 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
> >>
> >> > The current
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the main problem here is that, when we try
> to detect the initial regulator state, we ran into a "missing entry in
> the duty-cycle <-> voltage table" error, which
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but the main problem here is that, when we try
> to detect the initial regulator state, we ran into a "missing entry in
> the duty-cycle <-> voltage table" error, which then triggers an -EINVAL
> error
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 08:15:30 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
>> > The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2,
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 08:15:30 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
>> > The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
>> > pwm modulate vdd_logic
Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 08:15:30 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
> > The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
> > pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default disabled and
Am Montag, 19. September 2016, 08:15:30 CEST schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
> > The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
> > pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default disabled and
> > the pwm pin acts as a
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
> The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
> pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default disabled and
> the pwm pin acts as a gpio before pwm regulator probed, so the pwm
>
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andy Yan wrote:
> The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
> pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default disabled and
> the pwm pin acts as a gpio before pwm regulator probed, so the pwm
> regulator driver will get a zero
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:38:10 +0800
Andy Yan wrote:
> On 2016年09月19日 17:25, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:44:56 +0800
> > Andy Yan wrote:
> >
> >> The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
> >> pwm
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:38:10 +0800
Andy Yan wrote:
> On 2016年09月19日 17:25, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:44:56 +0800
> > Andy Yan wrote:
> >
> >> The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
> >> pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default
On 2016年09月19日 17:25, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:44:56 +0800
Andy Yan wrote:
The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default disabled and
the pwm pin acts as a gpio before
On 2016年09月19日 17:25, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:44:56 +0800
Andy Yan wrote:
The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default disabled and
the pwm pin acts as a gpio before pwm regulator probed, so
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:44:56 +0800
Andy Yan wrote:
> The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
> pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default disabled and
> the pwm pin acts as a gpio before pwm regulator probed, so the pwm
> regulator
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:44:56 +0800
Andy Yan wrote:
> The current rk3066a based boards(Rayeager, Bqcurie2, Marsboard) use
> pwm modulate vdd_logic voltage, but the pwm is default disabled and
> the pwm pin acts as a gpio before pwm regulator probed, so the pwm
> regulator driver will get a zero
40 matches
Mail list logo