On 11/20/2018 10:12 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>
>> On 11/20/2018 01:42 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> The current value of the early boot static pool size is not big enough
>>> for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
>>> objects
On 11/20/2018 10:12 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
>>
>> On 11/20/2018 01:42 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> The current value of the early boot static pool size is not big enough
>>> for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
>>> objects
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> On 11/20/2018 01:42 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>> The current value of the early boot static pool size is not big enough
>> for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
>> objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Waiman Long wrote:
>
> On 11/20/2018 01:42 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
>> The current value of the early boot static pool size is not big enough
>> for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
>> objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+
On 11/20/2018 01:42 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> The current value of the early boot static pool size is not big enough
> for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
> objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+ CPUs with both timer
> and workqueue objects enabled could
On 11/20/2018 01:42 AM, Qian Cai wrote:
> The current value of the early boot static pool size is not big enough
> for systems with large number of CPUs with timer or/and workqueue
> objects selected. As the results, systems have 60+ CPUs with both timer
> and workqueue objects enabled could
6 matches
Mail list logo