On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:34:08AM +, Cong Ding wrote:
> We do not allow old-style function definition. Always spell foo(void) if
> a function does not take any parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Ding
> ---
> drivers/staging/telephony/ixj.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:56:09PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:34:08AM +, Cong Ding wrote:
> > We do not allow old-style function definition. Always spell foo(void) if
> > a function does not take any parameters.
> >
>
> You should be working against linux-next.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:34:08AM +, Cong Ding wrote:
> We do not allow old-style function definition. Always spell foo(void) if
> a function does not take any parameters.
>
You should be working against linux-next. This driver has been
deleted in linux-next.
The subject should have
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:34:08AM +, Cong Ding wrote:
We do not allow old-style function definition. Always spell foo(void) if
a function does not take any parameters.
You should be working against linux-next. This driver has been
deleted in linux-next.
The subject should have been:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:56:09PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:34:08AM +, Cong Ding wrote:
We do not allow old-style function definition. Always spell foo(void) if
a function does not take any parameters.
You should be working against linux-next. This
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 10:34:08AM +, Cong Ding wrote:
We do not allow old-style function definition. Always spell foo(void) if
a function does not take any parameters.
Signed-off-by: Cong Ding ding...@gmail.com
---
drivers/staging/telephony/ixj.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
