On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 15 January 2013 14:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> You forgot the mem2mem type of transfers where we have no information
>> about masters except default settings. Otherwise there is the case of
>> custom slave config absence when we supply
On 15 January 2013 14:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> You forgot the mem2mem type of transfers where we have no information
> about masters except default settings. Otherwise there is the case of
> custom slave config absence when we supply only request line via
> slave_id.
Okay, but even for
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>>> The details of the patch are fine, but i didn't get how do you get
>>> master 1 selected
>>> on a system where you have only 1 master?
>>
>> min_t(..., nr_masters - 1, m)
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>> The details of the patch are fine, but i didn't get how do you get
>> master 1 selected
>> on a system where you have only 1 master?
>
> min_t(..., nr_masters - 1, m) defines this. m is returned value with
> default settings, let's say
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko
andy.shevche...@gmail.com wrote:
The details of the patch are fine, but i didn't get how do you get
master 1 selected
on a system where you have only 1 master?
min_t(..., nr_masters - 1, m) defines this. m is returned value with
default
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko
andy.shevche...@gmail.com wrote:
The details of the patch are fine, but i didn't get how do you get
master 1 selected
on a system where you have only 1 master?
On 15 January 2013 14:38, Andy Shevchenko andy.shevche...@gmail.com wrote:
You forgot the mem2mem type of transfers where we have no information
about masters except default settings. Otherwise there is the case of
custom slave config absence when we supply only request line via
slave_id.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 15 January 2013 14:38, Andy Shevchenko andy.shevche...@gmail.com wrote:
You forgot the mem2mem type of transfers where we have no information
about masters except default settings. Otherwise there is the case of
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>> The driver's default assumes that hardware has two AHB masters which might be
>> not true. In such rare cases we have not to exceed a number of the AHB
>> masters
>> present in
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> The driver's default assumes that hardware has two AHB masters which might be
> not true. In such rare cases we have not to exceed a number of the AHB masters
> present in the hardware. Thus, the AHB master with highest possible number
>
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
The driver's default assumes that hardware has two AHB masters which might be
not true. In such rare cases we have not to exceed a number of the AHB masters
present in the hardware. Thus, the AHB master
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Andy Shevchenko
andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote:
The driver's default assumes that hardware has two AHB masters which might be
not true. In such rare cases we have not to
12 matches
Mail list logo
