> Just tested this patch on a macbook pro with i915 and radeon. First I get a
> nasty lockdep splat, then it locks up completely:
>
> [ 13.507373] fb: conflicting fb hw usage radeondrmfb vs EFI VGA - removing
> generic driver
The EFI driver is known to need other work of its own.
Alan
--
To
Hey,
Op 13-01-13 01:02, Borislav Petkov schreef:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:13:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> Florian has been taking a month or two's downtime (now expired, I
>> think) so I've been waiting for him to reappear to process this one for
>> 3.8.
>>
>> Meanwhile, I guess we
Hey,
Op 13-01-13 01:02, Borislav Petkov schreef:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:13:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Florian has been taking a month or two's downtime (now expired, I
think) so I've been waiting for him to reappear to process this one for
3.8.
Meanwhile, I guess we could put it
Just tested this patch on a macbook pro with i915 and radeon. First I get a
nasty lockdep splat, then it locks up completely:
[ 13.507373] fb: conflicting fb hw usage radeondrmfb vs EFI VGA - removing
generic driver
The EFI driver is known to need other work of its own.
Alan
--
To
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:13:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Florian has been taking a month or two's downtime (now expired, I
> think) so I've been waiting for him to reappear to process this one for
> 3.8.
>
> Meanwhile, I guess we could put it into mainline ;) It has been in
> -next for a
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:51:49 -0800 Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> >> Still seeing it with current Linus' tree.
> >>
> >> Tested-by: Jiri Kosina
> >>
> >> Anyone
Alan is dealing with family stuff that is far more important. Someone who has
the time needs to own this and the fb layer. Not a don't care - a don't have
time.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> Still seeing it with current Linus' tree.
>>
>> Tested-by: Jiri Kosina
>>
>> Anyone applying this, please?
>
> Yeah, I'm still seeing it in -rc3. Linus, can you pick
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Still seeing it with current Linus' tree.
>
> Tested-by: Jiri Kosina
>
> Anyone applying this, please?
Yeah, I'm still seeing it in -rc3. Linus, can you pick up Alan's patch
from
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
Still seeing it with current Linus' tree.
Tested-by: Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz
Anyone applying this, please?
Yeah, I'm still seeing it in -rc3. Linus, can you pick up Alan's patch
from
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
Still seeing it with current Linus' tree.
Tested-by: Jiri Kosina jkos...@suse.cz
Anyone applying this, please?
Yeah, I'm still seeing it in -rc3.
Alan is dealing with family stuff that is far more important. Someone who has
the time needs to own this and the fb layer. Not a don't care - a don't have
time.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:51:49 -0800 Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 10:37:15AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
Still seeing it with current Linus' tree.
Tested-by: Jiri
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:13:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Florian has been taking a month or two's downtime (now expired, I
think) so I've been waiting for him to reappear to process this one for
3.8.
Meanwhile, I guess we could put it into mainline ;) It has been in
-next for a month.
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
>
> Cool, works fine here too. Is Linus on CC? (/me checks.. ) Yes he is,
> good.
>
> Linus, Alan's patch works at least in 2 cases, you might consider
> picking it up directly since
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Borislav Petkov wrote:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
Cool, works fine here too. Is Linus on CC? (/me checks.. ) Yes he is,
good.
Linus, Alan's patch works at least in 2 cases, you might consider
picking it up directly since the fb
Am 05.01.2013 13:07, schrieb Alan Cox:
So to add such an "I am crap" flag my idea would be to add an
.fb_handle_damage to struct fb_ops and then call that (if exists)
whenever something was changed.
I was thinking much higher level - ie at the printk kind of level
My patch (for udlfb)
> So to add such an "I am crap" flag my idea would be to add an
> .fb_handle_damage to struct fb_ops and then call that (if exists)
> whenever something was changed.
I was thinking much higher level - ie at the printk kind of level
> My patch (for udlfb) follows as an reply to this message. If
Am 04.01.2013 14:36, schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 04.01.2013 14:25, schrieb Alan Cox:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:50:37 +0100
Alexander Holler wrote:
...
Btw. I think all the usb-fb's (udlfb, smscufx and udl) are broken, at
least on ARM(v5). When I have linked in udlfb the following happens on
Am 04.01.2013 14:36, schrieb Alexander Holler:
Am 04.01.2013 14:25, schrieb Alan Cox:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:50:37 +0100
Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
...
Btw. I think all the usb-fb's (udlfb, smscufx and udl) are broken, at
least on ARM(v5). When I have linked in udlfb the
So to add such an I am crap flag my idea would be to add an
.fb_handle_damage to struct fb_ops and then call that (if exists)
whenever something was changed.
I was thinking much higher level - ie at the printk kind of level
My patch (for udlfb) follows as an reply to this message. If that
Am 05.01.2013 13:07, schrieb Alan Cox:
So to add such an I am crap flag my idea would be to add an
.fb_handle_damage to struct fb_ops and then call that (if exists)
whenever something was changed.
I was thinking much higher level - ie at the printk kind of level
My patch (for udlfb) follows
Am 04.01.2013 14:25, schrieb Alan Cox:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:50:37 +0100
Alexander Holler wrote:
Am 28.12.2012 13:40, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+1
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
Cool, works fine
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:50:37 +0100
Alexander Holler wrote:
> Am 28.12.2012 13:40, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
> > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> +1
> >>
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
> >
> > Cool, works fine here too. Is Linus
Am 28.12.2012 13:40, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+1
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
Cool, works fine here too. Is Linus on CC? (/me checks.. ) Yes he is,
good.
Linus, Alan's patch works at least in 2
Am 28.12.2012 13:40, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+1
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
Cool, works fine here too. Is Linus on CC? (/me checks.. ) Yes he is,
good.
Linus, Alan's patch works at least in 2
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:50:37 +0100
Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 28.12.2012 13:40, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+1
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
Cool, works fine here too. Is
Am 04.01.2013 14:25, schrieb Alan Cox:
On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:50:37 +0100
Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 28.12.2012 13:40, schrieb Borislav Petkov:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+1
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> +1
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
Cool, works fine here too. Is Linus on CC? (/me checks.. ) Yes he is,
good.
Linus, Alan's patch works at least in 2 cases, you might consider
picking it up
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 05:53:01AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 01:09:51PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > This patch can fix the following warning we saw?
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/22/53
> > >
> > > I will give it a try.
> >
> > Yup, that's the same error I've
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 05:53:01AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 01:09:51PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
This patch can fix the following warning we saw?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/22/53
I will give it a try.
Yup, that's the same error I've reported couple
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 07:50:27PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
+1
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1413953/focus=1415070
Cool, works fine here too. Is Linus on CC? (/me checks.. ) Yes he is,
good.
Linus, Alan's patch works at least in 2 cases, you might consider
picking it up directly
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 01:09:51PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > This patch can fix the following warning we saw?
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/22/53
> >
> > I will give it a try.
>
> Yup, that's the same error I've reported couple of months ago.
>
> It looks like the fb maintains are still
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Cong Wang xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 01:09:51PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
This patch can fix the following warning we saw?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/22/53
I will give it a try.
Yup, that's the same error I've reported couple of months ago.
It looks like the fb maintains are still absent, so
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
>>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> >
>>> > [The fb maintainer appears to be absent at the moment].
>>> >
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> >
>> > [The fb maintainer appears to be absent at the moment].
>> >
>> > This is needed to fix a pile of lockdep splats that now
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
[The fb maintainer appears to be absent at the moment].
This is
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > [The fb maintainer appears to be absent at the moment].
> >
> > This is needed to fix a pile of lockdep splats that now show up because
> > console_lock()
> > is being properly
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> [The fb maintainer appears to be absent at the moment].
>
> This is needed to fix a pile of lockdep splats that now show up because
> console_lock()
> is being properly audited. Hugh Dickins and Sasha Levin have tested it and
> both reports
>
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
[The fb maintainer appears to be absent at the moment].
This is needed to fix a pile of lockdep splats that now show up because
console_lock()
is being properly audited. Hugh Dickins and Sasha Levin have tested it and
On Wed, 21 Nov 2012 07:45:45 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
[The fb maintainer appears to be absent at the moment].
This is needed to fix a pile of lockdep splats that now show up because
46 matches
Mail list logo
