On Wednesday, March 04, 2015 07:42:46 PM Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> I'm a little late to the party here, but I have just a couple of minor
> comments...
>
> [...]
>
> > Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=142252777602084=2
> > Link: http://marc.info/?t=142252775300011=1=2
> > Linx:
Hi Rafael,
I'm a little late to the party here, but I have just a couple of minor
comments...
[...]
> Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=142252777602084=2
> Link: http://marc.info/?t=142252775300011=1=2
> Linx: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/15/552
s/x/k/ ?
> Reported-by: Boris Brezillon
Hi Rafael,
I'm a little late to the party here, but I have just a couple of minor
comments...
[...]
Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=142252777602084w=2
Link: http://marc.info/?t=142252775300011r=1w=2
Linx: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/15/552
s/x/k/ ?
Reported-by: Boris Brezillon
On Wednesday, March 04, 2015 07:42:46 PM Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Rafael,
I'm a little late to the party here, but I have just a couple of minor
comments...
[...]
Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=142252777602084w=2
Link: http://marc.info/?t=142252775300011r=1w=2
Linx:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:13:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 27, 2015 09:38:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Seems good to me. Should I take this through tip/irq ?
>
> I can apply it along with the previous IRQF_NO_SUSPEND documentation patch
> from Mark Rutland if you
On Friday, February 27, 2015 09:38:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:07:55AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > It currently is required that all users of NO_SUSPEND interrupt
> > lines pass the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag when requesting the IRQ
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:07:55AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> It currently is required that all users of NO_SUSPEND interrupt
> lines pass the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag when requesting the IRQ or the
> WARN_ON_ONCE() in irq_pm_install_action() will trigger. That is
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:13:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, February 27, 2015 09:38:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Seems good to me. Should I take this through tip/irq ?
I can apply it along with the previous IRQF_NO_SUSPEND documentation patch
from Mark Rutland if you ACK
On Friday, February 27, 2015 09:38:59 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:07:55AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
It currently is required that all users of NO_SUSPEND interrupt
lines pass the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag when
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:07:55AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
It currently is required that all users of NO_SUSPEND interrupt
lines pass the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag when requesting the IRQ or the
WARN_ON_ONCE() in irq_pm_install_action()
10 matches
Mail list logo