> Did you also pick up the i2c-xlp9xx patches for current?
Dunno which one of those you mean, but I reply to every patch to which
branch I applied it to so you can check it easily.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> Did you also pick up the i2c-xlp9xx patches for current?
Dunno which one of those you mean, but I reply to every patch to which
branch I applied it to so you can check it easily.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> > The error message:
> >
> > [Fri Feb 16 13:42:13 2018] i2c-thunderx :01:09.4: unhandled state: 0
> >
> > is mis-leading as state 0 (bus error) is not an
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> > The error message:
> >
> > [Fri Feb 16 13:42:13 2018] i2c-thunderx :01:09.4: unhandled state: 0
> >
> > is mis-leading as state 0 (bus error) is not an unknown state.
> >
>
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> The error message:
>
> [Fri Feb 16 13:42:13 2018] i2c-thunderx :01:09.4: unhandled state: 0
>
> is mis-leading as state 0 (bus error) is not an unknown state.
>
> Return -EIO as before but avoid printing the message. Also rename
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Jan Glauber wrote:
> The error message:
>
> [Fri Feb 16 13:42:13 2018] i2c-thunderx :01:09.4: unhandled state: 0
>
> is mis-leading as state 0 (bus error) is not an unknown state.
>
> Return -EIO as before but avoid printing the message. Also rename
6 matches
Mail list logo