> It costs 4.xx k space per CPU - perhaps a constraint for embedded?
Not a major one.
> >In fact I would prefer to just eliminate CONFIG_DOUBLEFAULT (imho
> >it always a bad idea because the amount of code it saves is miniscule)
> > instead of adding such a ifdef maze.
>
> It's configurable for
>>> Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01.09.07 12:33 >>>
>
>Can you cc the next version to Linus please? He's probably best qualified
>to review the i386 double fault handler because he wrote it originally.
>I must admit the code always scared me a bit.
Will do.
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>>
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01.09.07 12:33
Can you cc the next version to Linus please? He's probably best qualified
to review the i386 double fault handler because he wrote it originally.
I must admit the code always scared me a bit.
Will do.
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+static void
Can you cc the next version to Linus please? He's probably best qualified
to review the i386 double fault handler because he wrote it originally.
I must admit the code always scared me a bit.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +static void *noinline __init_refok
> +#else
> +static inline void
Can you cc the next version to Linus please? He's probably best qualified
to review the i386 double fault handler because he wrote it originally.
I must admit the code always scared me a bit.
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+static void *noinline __init_refok
+#else
+static inline void *__init
5 matches
Mail list logo