On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Thanks for the feedback, ugly indeed, i was really trying to avoid adding
> > a new API function or extra cpu_* variables. Ok, here is an
> > early_node_to_cpumask instead.
>
> Thinking about it again it's most likely broken with CPU hotplug anyways
>
> Thanks for the feedback, ugly indeed, i was really trying to avoid adding
> a new API function or extra cpu_* variables. Ok, here is an
> early_node_to_cpumask instead.
Thinking about it again it's most likely broken with CPU hotplug anyways
whatever you're doing. So how does your code handle
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:07:53PM -0600, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > node_to_cpumask on non NUMA systems is broken if used before all the
> > processors have been brought up as it returns cpu_online_map, as opposed
> > to NUMA i386 systems which does it
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:07:53PM -0600, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> node_to_cpumask on non NUMA systems is broken if used before all the
> processors have been brought up as it returns cpu_online_map, as opposed
> to NUMA i386 systems which does it earlier than AP bringup. So return
> which
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:07:53PM -0600, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
node_to_cpumask on non NUMA systems is broken if used before all the
processors have been brought up as it returns cpu_online_map, as opposed
to NUMA i386 systems which does it earlier than AP bringup. So return
which
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:07:53PM -0600, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
node_to_cpumask on non NUMA systems is broken if used before all the
processors have been brought up as it returns cpu_online_map, as opposed
to NUMA i386 systems which does it earlier
Thanks for the feedback, ugly indeed, i was really trying to avoid adding
a new API function or extra cpu_* variables. Ok, here is an
early_node_to_cpumask instead.
Thinking about it again it's most likely broken with CPU hotplug anyways
whatever you're doing. So how does your code handle
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
Thanks for the feedback, ugly indeed, i was really trying to avoid adding
a new API function or extra cpu_* variables. Ok, here is an
early_node_to_cpumask instead.
Thinking about it again it's most likely broken with CPU hotplug anyways
whatever
8 matches
Mail list logo
