[ radio cards ]
> These drivers seem to be unmantained :)
Erm, no. I'm still behind the radio-aztech driver plus my mods on
radio-aimslab and radio-cadet. Calling them unmaintained is going too
far. As for the others, that's up to their respective authors.
I use the cadet every couple of
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > 2) i found that some net drivers (3c527.c, sk_mca.c) use io region and
> > don't call request_region() at all. Should they be fixed ?
>
> Probably.
>
> MCA bus ensures there can be no collisions of I/O space but it does mean the
> user cannot see what is where as is
> 2) i found that some net drivers (3c527.c, sk_mca.c) use io region and
> don't call request_region() at all. Should they be fixed ?
Probably.
MCA bus ensures there can be no collisions of I/O space but it does mean the
user cannot see what is where as is
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Andrey Panin wrote:
> 1) how about drivers requesting 2 (or more) irq for one device ?
> AFAIK some PowerMac net drivers do it (bmac.c for example).
Should be fine.. If the driver distinguishes between the irqs, maybe
you should do "eth0-rx dma", "eth0-tx dma", etc.
> 2) i found that some net
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 07:13:46PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Hi all,
>
> Finally, a word to you, Alan, and others doing request_region work: it
> is more informative to pass the device name (minor, etc.) into
> request_region. Ditto for request_irq. Many (most, except net?)
> drivers use
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 07:13:46PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Hi all,
Finally, a word to you, Alan, and others doing request_region work: it
is more informative to pass the device name (minor, etc.) into
request_region. Ditto for request_irq. Many (most, except net?)
drivers use
Andrey Panin wrote:
1) how about drivers requesting 2 (or more) irq for one device ?
AFAIK some PowerMac net drivers do it (bmac.c for example).
Should be fine.. If the driver distinguishes between the irqs, maybe
you should do "eth0-rx dma", "eth0-tx dma", etc.
2) i found that some net
2) i found that some net drivers (3c527.c, sk_mca.c) use io region and
don't call request_region() at all. Should they be fixed ?
Probably.
MCA bus ensures there can be no collisions of I/O space but it does mean the
user cannot see what is where as is
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Alan Cox wrote:
2) i found that some net drivers (3c527.c, sk_mca.c) use io region and
don't call request_region() at all. Should they be fixed ?
Probably.
MCA bus ensures there can be no collisions of I/O space but it does mean the
user cannot see what is where as is
Ditto for
[ radio cards ]
These drivers seem to be unmantained :)
Erm, no. I'm still behind the radio-aztech driver plus my mods on
radio-aimslab and radio-cadet. Calling them unmaintained is going too
far. As for the others, that's up to their respective authors.
I use the cadet every couple of
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Patch looks generally ok. Some of the whitespace/formatting changes are
> > questionable, I usually leave that up to the maintainer unless it is
> > very gratuitously opposite to CodingStyle.
> >
>
> These
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Patch looks generally ok. Some of the whitespace/formatting changes are
> questionable, I usually leave that up to the maintainer unless it is
> very gratuitously opposite to CodingStyle.
>
These drivers seem to be unmantained :)
Anyway if this is a
Patch looks generally ok. Some of the whitespace/formatting changes are
questionable, I usually leave that up to the maintainer unless it is
very gratuitously opposite to CodingStyle.
Some of the driver messages ("foo version 1.0") are purposefully printed
-after-, not before, the device is
Patch looks generally ok. Some of the whitespace/formatting changes are
questionable, I usually leave that up to the maintainer unless it is
very gratuitously opposite to CodingStyle.
Some of the driver messages ("foo version 1.0") are purposefully printed
-after-, not before, the device is
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Patch looks generally ok. Some of the whitespace/formatting changes are
questionable, I usually leave that up to the maintainer unless it is
very gratuitously opposite to CodingStyle.
These drivers seem to be unmantained :)
Anyway if this is a problem
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Patch looks generally ok. Some of the whitespace/formatting changes are
questionable, I usually leave that up to the maintainer unless it is
very gratuitously opposite to CodingStyle.
These drivers seem to be
16 matches
Mail list logo
