On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 09:53 -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:15 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:37 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > > Hey... I am amazed at how quickly you came back with a patch fo
On 8/3/07, Adam Litke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:15 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:37 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > > Hey... I am amazed at how quickly you came back with a patch for this :)
> > > Thanks for looking at it. Unfortunately there is
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:15 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:37 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> > Hey... I am amazed at how quickly you came back with a patch for this :)
> > Thanks for looking at it. Unfortunately there is one show-stopper and I
> > have some reservations (pun de
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 11:37 -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> Hey... I am amazed at how quickly you came back with a patch for this :)
> Thanks for looking at it. Unfortunately there is one show-stopper and I
> have some reservations (pun definitely intended) with your approach:
Thanks for your great com
Hey... I am amazed at how quickly you came back with a patch for this :)
Thanks for looking at it. Unfortunately there is one show-stopper and I
have some reservations (pun definitely intended) with your approach:
First, your patch does not pass the libhugetlbfs test
'alloc-instantiate-race' whic
5 matches
Mail list logo
