Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-21 Thread Tim Chen
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 22:02 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote: > > From: Tim Chen > > Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions > > implementations > >sha: is not a proper subsystem name > >x86/cpufeatures: is the correct one >

Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote: > From: Tim Chen > Subject: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions > implementations sha: is not a proper subsystem name x86/cpufeatures: is the correct one > Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations This patch d

Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-20 Thread Tim Chen
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 06:08 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:49:58AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > > Mouli did the patch originally but he left the company. So > > I'm picking it up. > > So the SOB chain should be: > > From: you > > > > Originally-by: Mouli > Signed-off-

Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-19 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 09:49:58AM -0700, Tim Chen wrote: > On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 18:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan > > > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen > > > > And now the question who authored this complex one line

Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-19 Thread Tim Chen
On Tue, 2015-08-18 at 18:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan > > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen > > And now the question who authored this complex one liner > Mouli did the patch originally but he left the company. So

Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-18 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Tim Chen wrote: > Signed-off-by: Chandramouli Narayanan > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen And now the question who authored this complex one liner > --- > arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatu

Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-17 Thread Tim Chen
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 14:19 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 08/17/2015 01:44 PM, Tim Chen wrote: > > @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32]; > > #define cpu_has_eager_fpu boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU) > > #define cpu_has_topoextboot_cpu_has(X86_

Re: [PATCH] sha: Enable cpuid check for Intel SHA extensions implementations

2015-08-17 Thread Dave Hansen
On 08/17/2015 01:44 PM, Tim Chen wrote: > @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_bug_flags[NBUGINTS*32]; > #define cpu_has_eager_fpuboot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU) > #define cpu_has_topoext boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT) > #define cpu_has_bpextb