Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-06 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:21:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Ok, patch fixed, works for me with Calgary. Andi, it looks like you > > added the acpi.c NUMA bits originally, perhaps you could test and/or > > ack them? > > Just so there is no misunderstanding, I added the allocation bits. > >

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-06 Thread Jeff Garzik
> Ok, patch fixed, works for me with Calgary. Andi, it looks like you > added the acpi.c NUMA bits originally, perhaps you could test and/or > ack them? Just so there is no misunderstanding, I added the allocation bits. No idea who added the direct usage of ->sysdata for NUMA info. > diff -r

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-06 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:29:05PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and > > converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it. > > > > This eliminates the

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 -sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-06 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:29:05PM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it. This eliminates the conflict between

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 -sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-06 Thread Jeff Garzik
Ok, patch fixed, works for me with Calgary. Andi, it looks like you added the acpi.c NUMA bits originally, perhaps you could test and/or ack them? Just so there is no misunderstanding, I added the allocation bits. No idea who added the direct usage of -sysdata for NUMA info. diff -r

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 -sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-06 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:21:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Ok, patch fixed, works for me with Calgary. Andi, it looks like you added the acpi.c NUMA bits originally, perhaps you could test and/or ack them? Just so there is no misunderstanding, I added the allocation bits. No idea who

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-05 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and > converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it. > > This eliminates the conflict between NUMA and Calgary using the same > pointer for different uses, and

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 -sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-05 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it. This eliminates the conflict between NUMA and Calgary using the same pointer for different uses, and lays

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 ->sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-04 Thread Keshavamurthy, Anil S
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and > converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it. > > This eliminates the conflict between NUMA and Calgary using the same > pointer for different uses, and

Re: [PATCH] stop x86 -sysdata abuse; introduce pci_sysdata

2007-06-04 Thread Keshavamurthy, Anil S
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:05:51PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it. This eliminates the conflict between NUMA and Calgary using the same pointer for different uses, and lays