Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2016-10-16 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Hi Guenter, On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 08:55:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: > > > > > > Looks like this one falls through the cracks, it didn't reach mainline > > > and therefore wasn't applied to

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2016-10-16 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Hi Guenter, On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 08:55:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: > > > > > > Looks like this one falls through the cracks, it didn't reach mainline > > > and therefore wasn't applied to

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2016-10-16 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Hi, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > > Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: > > at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with > > at91sam9260-wdt not using a

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2016-10-16 Thread Sylvain Rochet
Hi, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > > Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: > > at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with > > at91sam9260-wdt not using a

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2016-10-16 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: at91sam9_wdt:

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2016-10-16 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: at91sam9_wdt:

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2016-10-16 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2016-10-16 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote: Hi, On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote: On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2015-10-07 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi Sylvain, On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: > at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with > at91sam9260-wdt not using a device tree no longer reboot if the watchdog > times out while the CPU

Re: [PATCH] watchdog: at91sam9: keep watchdog running in idle mode

2015-10-07 Thread Alexandre Belloni
Hi Sylvain, On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote : > Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog: > at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with > at91sam9260-wdt not using a device tree no longer reboot if the watchdog > times out while the CPU