On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:20:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
> > need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
> > mcp55...
> >
> > but latest kernel already have that
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:20:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Yinghai Lu wrote:
BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
mcp55...
but latest kernel already have that workaround to make
Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:20:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
>>> need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
>>> mcp55...
>>>
>>> but latest kernel
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:20:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
> > need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
> > mcp55...
> >
> > but latest kernel already have that
Andreas Herrmann wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:47, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:47, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > [PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in
Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On 9/13/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>> BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
>>> need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
>>> mcp55...
>>>
>>> but latest kernel already have that
On 9/13/07, H. Peter Anvin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
> > need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
> > mcp55...
> >
> > but latest kernel already have that workaround to make
Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
> need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
> mcp55...
>
> but latest kernel already have that workaround to make mmconfig via eax...
>
This is actually a good point. Since the
On 9/13/07, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:47, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > > [PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case
On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:47, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > [PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case MMCONFIG is
> > > used.
> > >
> > > reuse pci_cfg_space_size
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > [PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case MMCONFIG is used.
> >
> > reuse pci_cfg_space_size but skip check pci express and pci-x CAP ID.
>
> I just rejected a
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> [PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case MMCONFIG is used.
>
> reuse pci_cfg_space_size but skip check pci express and pci-x CAP ID.
I just rejected a similar patch -- this should be done using MMCONFIG
-Andi
-
To
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case MMCONFIG is used.
reuse pci_cfg_space_size but skip check pci express and pci-x CAP ID.
I just rejected a similar patch -- this should be done using MMCONFIG
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case MMCONFIG is used.
reuse pci_cfg_space_size but skip check pci express and pci-x CAP ID.
I just rejected a similar
On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:47, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case MMCONFIG is
used.
reuse pci_cfg_space_size but skip check
On 9/13/07, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:47, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case MMCONFIG is
Yinghai Lu wrote:
BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
mcp55...
but latest kernel already have that workaround to make mmconfig via eax...
This is actually a good point. Since the CPU
On 9/13/07, H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yinghai Lu wrote:
BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
mcp55...
but latest kernel already have that workaround to make mmconfig via
Yinghai Lu wrote:
On 9/13/07, H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yinghai Lu wrote:
BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
mcp55...
but latest kernel already have that workaround to make
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:47, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case
Andreas Herrmann wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 12:47, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:47:42AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:21, Yinghai Lu wrote:
[PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:20:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Yinghai Lu wrote:
BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
mcp55...
but latest kernel already have that workaround to make
Andreas Herrmann wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:20:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Yinghai Lu wrote:
BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
mcp55...
but latest kernel already have that
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:21:43 -0700 Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +/**
> + * Regular PCI devices have 256 bytes, but AMD Family 10h Opteron ext config
> + * have 4096 bytes. Even if the device is capable, that doesn't mean we can
> + * access it. Maybe we don't have a way to generate
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:21:43 -0700 Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+/**
+ * Regular PCI devices have 256 bytes, but AMD Family 10h Opteron ext config
+ * have 4096 bytes. Even if the device is capable, that doesn't mean we can
+ * access it. Maybe we don't have a way to generate
26 matches
Mail list logo