On 10/20/07, Phillip Susi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Huang, Ying wrote:
> > The hibernation procedure with the patch set is as follow:
> >
> > 1. Boot a kernel A
> >
> > 2. Work under kernel A
> >
> > 3. Kexec another kernel B (crash dump enabled) in kernel A.
> >
> > 4. Save the memory image of
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Phillip Susi wrote:
Huang, Ying wrote:
The restore process with the patch set is as follow:
1. Boot a kernel C (crash dump enabled), the memory area used by
kernel C must be a subset of memory area used by kernel B.
Why is a third kernel needed? Why can't kernel B
Huang, Ying wrote:
The hibernation procedure with the patch set is as follow:
1. Boot a kernel A
2. Work under kernel A
3. Kexec another kernel B (crash dump enabled) in kernel A.
4. Save the memory image of kernel A through crash dump (such as "cp
/proc/vmcore ~"). Save the "jump back
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Phillip Susi wrote:
Huang, Ying wrote:
The restore process with the patch set is as follow:
1. Boot a kernel C (crash dump enabled), the memory area used by
kernel C must be a subset of memory area used by kernel B.
Why is a third kernel needed? Why can't kernel B
Huang, Ying wrote:
The hibernation procedure with the patch set is as follow:
1. Boot a kernel A
2. Work under kernel A
3. Kexec another kernel B (crash dump enabled) in kernel A.
4. Save the memory image of kernel A through crash dump (such as cp
/proc/vmcore ~). Save the jump back
On 10/20/07, Phillip Susi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huang, Ying wrote:
The hibernation procedure with the patch set is as follow:
1. Boot a kernel A
2. Work under kernel A
3. Kexec another kernel B (crash dump enabled) in kernel A.
4. Save the memory image of kernel A through
On Friday, 12 October 2007 05:19, Huang, Ying wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 12:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 11 October 2007 04:13, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > > Kexec base hibernation has some potential advantages over uswsusp and
> > > TuxOnIce (suspend2). Some most obvious
On Friday, 12 October 2007 05:19, Huang, Ying wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 12:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2007 04:13, Huang, Ying wrote:
Kexec base hibernation has some potential advantages over uswsusp and
TuxOnIce (suspend2). Some most obvious advantages
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 12:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 11 October 2007 04:13, Huang, Ying wrote:
> > Kexec base hibernation has some potential advantages over uswsusp and
> > TuxOnIce (suspend2). Some most obvious advantages are:
>
> Well, I have some doubts as far as the
On Thursday, 11 October 2007 04:13, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Kexec base hibernation has some potential advantages over uswsusp and
> TuxOnIce (suspend2). Some most obvious advantages are:
Well, I have some doubts as far as the obviousness is concerned.
> 1. The hibernation image size can exceed half
On Thursday, 11 October 2007 04:13, Huang, Ying wrote:
Kexec base hibernation has some potential advantages over uswsusp and
TuxOnIce (suspend2). Some most obvious advantages are:
Well, I have some doubts as far as the obviousness is concerned.
1. The hibernation image size can exceed half of
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 12:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 11 October 2007 04:13, Huang, Ying wrote:
Kexec base hibernation has some potential advantages over uswsusp and
TuxOnIce (suspend2). Some most obvious advantages are:
Well, I have some doubts as far as the obviousness
12 matches
Mail list logo
