Andreas,
On Wed, Oct 14 2020 at 09:12, Andreas Meisinger wrote:
> Sorry about the wrong format/style of my last mail, hope I did get it
> right this time.
No problem. Yes this looks better. The only thing which could be
improved is that your mail client fails to add
In-Reply-To:
References:
Hello Thomas,
Sorry about the wrong format/style of my last mail, hope I did get it right
this time.
Let me first point at an important thing because we did have discussions here
about it too. As of the manpages Linux CLOCK_TAI seems to be defined as an
nonsettable clock which does have the
Vinicius,
On Fri, Oct 02 2020 at 12:01, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> I think that there's an underlying problem/limitation that is the cause
> of the issue (or at least a step in the right direction) you are trying
> to solve: the issue is that PTP clocks can't be used as hrtimers.
That's only
On 02/10/2020 21:01, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> Hi Erez,
>
> Erez Geva writes:
>
>> Add support for using PTP clock with
>> Traffic control Earliest TxTime First (ETF) Qdisc.
>>
>> Why do we need ETF to use PTP clock?
>> Current ETF requires to synchronization the system clock
>> to the
Hi Erez,
Erez Geva writes:
> Add support for using PTP clock with
> Traffic control Earliest TxTime First (ETF) Qdisc.
>
> Why do we need ETF to use PTP clock?
> Current ETF requires to synchronization the system clock
> to the PTP Hardware clock (PHC) we want to send through.
> But there are
5 matches
Mail list logo
