(2015/03/13 1:33), Petr Mladek wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Fri 2015-02-27 16:32:01, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hi Petr,
>>
>> (2015/02/27 1:13), Petr Mladek wrote:
>>> arm_kprobe_ftrace() could fail, especially after introducing ftrace IPMODIFY
>>> flag and LifePatching. This patch set adds the
(2015/03/13 1:33), Petr Mladek wrote:
Hi Masami,
On Fri 2015-02-27 16:32:01, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Hi Petr,
(2015/02/27 1:13), Petr Mladek wrote:
arm_kprobe_ftrace() could fail, especially after introducing ftrace IPMODIFY
flag and LifePatching. This patch set adds the error handling
Hi Masami,
On Fri 2015-02-27 16:32:01, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> (2015/02/27 1:13), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > arm_kprobe_ftrace() could fail, especially after introducing ftrace IPMODIFY
> > flag and LifePatching. This patch set adds the error handling and also some
> > related fixes.
Hi Masami,
On Fri 2015-02-27 16:32:01, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
Hi Petr,
(2015/02/27 1:13), Petr Mladek wrote:
arm_kprobe_ftrace() could fail, especially after introducing ftrace IPMODIFY
flag and LifePatching. This patch set adds the error handling and also some
related fixes.
Hmm,
Hi Petr,
(2015/02/27 1:13), Petr Mladek wrote:
> arm_kprobe_ftrace() could fail, especially after introducing ftrace IPMODIFY
> flag and LifePatching. This patch set adds the error handling and also some
> related fixes.
Hmm, I'd like to drop IPMODIFY from kprobes except for jprobes,
since it
Hi Petr,
(2015/02/27 1:13), Petr Mladek wrote:
arm_kprobe_ftrace() could fail, especially after introducing ftrace IPMODIFY
flag and LifePatching. This patch set adds the error handling and also some
related fixes.
Hmm, I'd like to drop IPMODIFY from kprobes except for jprobes,
since it
6 matches
Mail list logo