On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 13:15 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-03-17 16:43:39 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> > If that's worth the lock dropping then fine (though why does only
> > one
> > of the two allocations use GFP_KERNEL?), but it doesn't need to be
> > a
>
> That was a
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 13:15 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-03-17 16:43:39 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> > If that's worth the lock dropping then fine (though why does only
> > one
> > of the two allocations use GFP_KERNEL?), but it doesn't need to be
> > a
>
> That was a
On 2018-03-17 16:43:39 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> If that's worth the lock dropping then fine (though why does only one
> of the two allocations use GFP_KERNEL?), but it doesn't need to be a
That was a mistake, I planned to keep both as GFP_KERNEL.
> raw lock if the non-allocating users are
On 2018-03-17 16:43:39 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> If that's worth the lock dropping then fine (though why does only one
> of the two allocations use GFP_KERNEL?), but it doesn't need to be a
That was a mistake, I planned to keep both as GFP_KERNEL.
> raw lock if the non-allocating users are
On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 22:10 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-03-17 14:49:54 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > The goal here is to make the memory allocation in get_irq_table()
> > > not
> > > with disabled
On Sat, 2018-03-17 at 22:10 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2018-03-17 14:49:54 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > The goal here is to make the memory allocation in get_irq_table()
> > > not
> > > with disabled
On 2018-03-17 14:49:54 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > The goal here is to make the memory allocation in get_irq_table() not
> > with disabled interrupts and having as little raw_spin_lock as
> > possible
> > while having them if
On 2018-03-17 14:49:54 [-0500], Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > The goal here is to make the memory allocation in get_irq_table() not
> > with disabled interrupts and having as little raw_spin_lock as
> > possible
> > while having them if
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The goal here is to make the memory allocation in get_irq_table() not
> with disabled interrupts and having as little raw_spin_lock as
> possible
> while having them if the caller is also holding one (like desc->lock
> during
On Fri, 2018-03-16 at 21:18 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> The goal here is to make the memory allocation in get_irq_table() not
> with disabled interrupts and having as little raw_spin_lock as
> possible
> while having them if the caller is also holding one (like desc->lock
> during
10 matches
Mail list logo
