Hi Jonas,
Thanks for your patch.
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 16:18 +, Jonas Karlman wrote:
[..]
>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h264.c
> > > b/drivers/staging/media/hantro/hantro_h264.c
> > > index 0d758e0c0f99..e2d01145ac4f 100644
> > > ---
On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 07:54 +, Jonas Karlman wrote:
[...]
> After a closer look both ffmpeg and rkmpp only apply zig-zag scan and not
> field scan,
> ffmpeg will memcpy the scaling_matrix4/8 as is for vaapi, vdpau and nvdec,
> for dxva2 there is a workaround flag that controls if zig-zag
On Mon, 2019-09-02 at 16:18 +, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> On 2019-09-02 16:00, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On Sun, 2019-09-01 at 12:45 +, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> > > Scaling list supplied from userspace using ffmpeg and libva-v4l2-request
> > > is already in matrix order and can
On 2019-09-02 18:18, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> On 2019-09-02 16:00, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> Hi Jonas,
>>
>> On Sun, 2019-09-01 at 12:45 +, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>>> Scaling list supplied from userspace using ffmpeg and libva-v4l2-request
>>> is already in matrix order and can be used without
On 2019-09-02 16:00, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> On Sun, 2019-09-01 at 12:45 +, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>> Scaling list supplied from userspace using ffmpeg and libva-v4l2-request
>> is already in matrix order and can be used without applying the inverse
>> scanning process.
> "in matrix
Hi Jonas,
On Sun, 2019-09-01 at 12:45 +, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> Scaling list supplied from userspace using ffmpeg and libva-v4l2-request
> is already in matrix order and can be used without applying the inverse
> scanning process.
"in matrix order" is equivalent to "in raster scan order"?
6 matches
Mail list logo