Il 25/01/2013 18:13, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
> Hello, Paolo.
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:01:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> First, because the table is based on
>> http://www.t10.org/lists/op-num.txt. Entries in that file look like this:
>>
>> OP DTLPWROMAEBKVF Description
>> --
Hello, Paolo.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:01:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> First, because the table is based on
> http://www.t10.org/lists/op-num.txt. Entries in that file look like this:
>
> OP DTLPWROMAEBKVF Description
> -- --
Il 24/01/2013 23:58, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
>
>> +#define sgio_bitmap_set(cmd, mask, rw) \
>> +if ((mask) != 0) __set_bit((cmd), filter->rw##_ok)
>> +
>> +#define D (1u << TYPE_DISK) /* Direct Access Block Device (SBC-3)
>> */
>> +#define T (1u << TYPE_TAPE) /* Sequential
Il 24/01/2013 23:58, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
+#define sgio_bitmap_set(cmd, mask, rw) \
+if ((mask) != 0) __set_bit((cmd), filter-rw##_ok)
+
+#define D (1u TYPE_DISK) /* Direct Access Block Device (SBC-3)
*/
+#define T (1u TYPE_TAPE) /* Sequential Access Device
Hello, Paolo.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:01:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
First, because the table is based on
http://www.t10.org/lists/op-num.txt. Entries in that file look like this:
OP DTLPWROMAEBKVF Description
-- --
Il 25/01/2013 18:13, Tejun Heo ha scritto:
Hello, Paolo.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:01:38AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
First, because the table is based on
http://www.t10.org/lists/op-num.txt. Entries in that file look like this:
OP DTLPWROMAEBKVF Description
-- --
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:49:21PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:42:03PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > One other thing is I would much prefer if the table was made static
> > const first. As we only allow compile-time defined tables, there's no
> > point in dynamically
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:42:03PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> One other thing is I would much prefer if the table was made static
> const first. As we only allow compile-time defined tables, there's no
> point in dynamically initializing these and the above can be static
> initializers.
On the
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:00:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> +#define sgio_bitmap_set(cmd, mask, rw) \
> + if ((mask) != 0) __set_bit((cmd), filter->rw##_ok)
> +
> +#define D (1u << TYPE_DISK) /* Direct Access Block Device (SBC-3)
> */
> +#define T (1u << TYPE_TAPE) /*
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 04:00:38PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
+#define sgio_bitmap_set(cmd, mask, rw) \
+ if ((mask) != 0) __set_bit((cmd), filter-rw##_ok)
+
+#define D (1u TYPE_DISK) /* Direct Access Block Device (SBC-3)
*/
+#define T (1u TYPE_TAPE) /* Sequential
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:42:03PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
One other thing is I would much prefer if the table was made static
const first. As we only allow compile-time defined tables, there's no
point in dynamically initializing these and the above can be static
initializers.
On the
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:49:21PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 02:42:03PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
One other thing is I would much prefer if the table was made static
const first. As we only allow compile-time defined tables, there's no
point in dynamically initializing
12 matches
Mail list logo