On Tue, Oct 30 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:50:58AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > How so? The reason you changed it to sg_init_table() + sg_set_buf() is
> > exactly because sg_init_one() didn't properly init the entry (as they
> > name promised).
>
> For one of the
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:50:58AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> How so? The reason you changed it to sg_init_table() + sg_set_buf() is
> exactly because sg_init_one() didn't properly init the entry (as they
> name promised).
For one of the cases yes but the other one repeatedly calls
sg_init_one
On Tue, Oct 30 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29 2007 at 22:16 +0200, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> [CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
> >>
> >> This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
On Mon, Oct 29 2007 at 22:16 +0200, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> [CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
>>
>> This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
>> algorithms so that it doesn't impact on the
On Mon, Oct 29 2007 at 22:16 +0200, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
[CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
algorithms so that it doesn't impact on the speed test
On Tue, Oct 30 2007, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29 2007 at 22:16 +0200, Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
[CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
algorithms
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:50:58AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
How so? The reason you changed it to sg_init_table() + sg_set_buf() is
exactly because sg_init_one() didn't properly init the entry (as they
name promised).
For one of the cases yes but the other one repeatedly calls
sg_init_one on
On Tue, Oct 30 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 06:50:58AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
How so? The reason you changed it to sg_init_table() + sg_set_buf() is
exactly because sg_init_one() didn't properly init the entry (as they
name promised).
For one of the cases yes but
On Tue, Oct 30 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:16:27PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > [CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
> > >
> > > This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
> > >
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:16:27PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > [CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
> >
> > This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
> > algorithms so that it doesn't impact on the speed test
On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
> [CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
>
> This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
> algorithms so that it doesn't impact on the speed test results.
Wouldn't it be better to just make sg_init_one() call
On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
[CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
algorithms so that it doesn't impact on the speed test results.
Wouldn't it be better to just make sg_init_one() call
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:16:27PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
[CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
algorithms so that it doesn't impact on the speed test results.
On Tue, Oct 30 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:16:27PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26 2007, Herbert Xu wrote:
[CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
algorithms so that
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:00:04 +0800
> [CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
>
> This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
> algorithms so that it doesn't impact on the speed test results.
>
> Signed-off-by:
From: Herbert Xu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:00:04 +0800
[CRYPTO] tcrypt: Move sg_init_table out of timing loops
This patch moves the sg_init_table out of the timing loops for hash
algorithms so that it doesn't impact on the speed test results.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu
16 matches
Mail list logo
