On 10/10/2015 12:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, October 09, 2015 09:38:13 AM Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 10/08/2015 03:53 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
@@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
*/
void wait_for_device_probe(void)
On 10/10/2015 12:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, October 09, 2015 09:38:13 AM Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 10/08/2015 03:53 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
@@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
*/
void wait_for_device_probe(void)
On Friday, October 09, 2015 09:38:13 AM Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 03:53 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >>> @@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
> >>>*/
> >>> void wait_for_device_probe(void)
> >>> {
> >>> + /* wait
On 10/08/2015 03:53 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>>> @@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
>>>*/
>>> void wait_for_device_probe(void)
>>> {
>>> + /* wait for the deferred probe workqueue to finish */
>>> + if
On Friday, October 09, 2015 09:38:13 AM Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 10/08/2015 03:53 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >>> @@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
> >>>*/
> >>> void wait_for_device_probe(void)
> >>> {
> >>> + /* wait
On 10/08/2015 03:53 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>>> @@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
>>>*/
>>> void wait_for_device_probe(void)
>>> {
>>> + /* wait for the deferred probe workqueue to finish */
>>> + if
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > @@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
> > */
> > void wait_for_device_probe(void)
> > {
> > + /* wait for the deferred probe workqueue to finish */
> > + if (driver_deferred_probe_enable)
> > +
On Thursday, October 08, 2015 11:57:06 AM Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Now wait_for_device_probe() waits for currently executing probes to finish,
> but it doesn't take into account deferred probing mechanism. As result,
> nothing prevents deferred probe workqueue to continue probing devices right
>
On Thursday, October 08, 2015 11:57:06 AM Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Now wait_for_device_probe() waits for currently executing probes to finish,
> but it doesn't take into account deferred probing mechanism. As result,
> nothing prevents deferred probe workqueue to continue probing devices right
>
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > @@ -391,6 +391,10 @@ int driver_probe_done(void)
> > */
> > void wait_for_device_probe(void)
> > {
> > + /* wait for the deferred probe workqueue to finish */
> > + if (driver_deferred_probe_enable)
> > +
10 matches
Mail list logo