On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Jiancheng Xue
wrote:
> On 2016/12/15 4:06, Marty Plummer wrote:
>>>
>> I have no objections. It looks like it might make my job a bit easier in
>> the end. I need to go ahead and rebase my patches anyways and fix up
>> earlier concerns
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:47 AM, Jiancheng Xue
wrote:
> On 2016/12/15 4:06, Marty Plummer wrote:
>>>
>> I have no objections. It looks like it might make my job a bit easier in
>> the end. I need to go ahead and rebase my patches anyways and fix up
>> earlier concerns raised about them, so go
On 2016/12/15 4:06, Marty Plummer wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 01:11 AM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016/12/9 23:07, Marty Plummer wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2016 08:03 PM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03
On 2016/12/15 4:06, Marty Plummer wrote:
> On 12/12/2016 01:11 AM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2016/12/9 23:07, Marty Plummer wrote:
>>> On 12/04/2016 08:03 PM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03
On 2016/12/9 23:07, Marty Plummer wrote:
> On 12/04/2016 08:03 PM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
On 2016/12/9 23:07, Marty Plummer wrote:
> On 12/04/2016 08:03 PM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
On 12/04/2016 08:03 PM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
>>> Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pan Wen
>>>
>>
On 12/04/2016 08:03 PM, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
>>> Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pan Wen
>>>
>>
>> Looks ok. I've added
Hi Arnd,
On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
>> Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Wen
>>
>
> Looks ok. I've added Marty Plummer to Cc, he was
Hi Arnd,
On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
>> Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Wen
>>
>
> Looks ok. I've added Marty Plummer to Cc, he was recently proposing
> patches
Hi Marty,
On 2016/11/17 11:03, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> On 2016/11/16 17:31, Wei Xu wrote:
>> Hi Pan,
>>
>> On 2016/11/16 8:56, wenpan wrote:
>>> Hi Marty,
>>> Does this confict with your patch? If not,I hope this could be merged
>>> first. Besides could you tell me the link to your
Hi Marty,
On 2016/11/17 11:03, Jiancheng Xue wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> On 2016/11/16 17:31, Wei Xu wrote:
>> Hi Pan,
>>
>> On 2016/11/16 8:56, wenpan wrote:
>>> Hi Marty,
>>> Does this confict with your patch? If not,I hope this could be merged
>>> first. Besides could you tell me the link to your
Hi Wei,
On 2016/11/16 17:31, Wei Xu wrote:
> Hi Pan,
>
> On 2016/11/16 8:56, wenpan wrote:
>> Hi Marty,
>> Does this confict with your patch? If not,I hope this could be merged first.
>> Besides could you tell me the link to your related patch?
>
> This is the link:
Hi Wei,
On 2016/11/16 17:31, Wei Xu wrote:
> Hi Pan,
>
> On 2016/11/16 8:56, wenpan wrote:
>> Hi Marty,
>> Does this confict with your patch? If not,I hope this could be merged first.
>> Besides could you tell me the link to your related patch?
>
> This is the link:
Hi Pan,
On 2016/11/16 8:56, wenpan wrote:
> Hi Marty,
> Does this confict with your patch? If not,I hope this could be merged first.
> Besides could you tell me the link to your related patch?
This is the link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9334743/
BR,
Wei
>
> Thanks,
> Pan
>
> On
Hi Pan,
On 2016/11/16 8:56, wenpan wrote:
> Hi Marty,
> Does this confict with your patch? If not,I hope this could be merged first.
> Besides could you tell me the link to your related patch?
This is the link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9334743/
BR,
Wei
>
> Thanks,
> Pan
>
> On
Hi Martyo<
Does this confict with your patcho< If noto<I hope this could be merged
first. Besides could you tell me the link to your related patch?
Thanks,
Pan
On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
>> Add support for some
Hi Martyo<
Does this confict with your patcho< If noto<I hope this could be merged
first. Besides could you tell me the link to your related patch?
Thanks,
Pan
On 2016/10/17 21:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
>> Add support for some
On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
> Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Wen
>
Looks ok. I've added Marty Plummer to Cc, he was recently proposing
patches for Hi3520, which I think is closely
On Monday, October 17, 2016 8:07:03 PM CEST Pan Wen wrote:
> Add support for some HiSilicon SoCs which depend on ARCH_MULTI_V5.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Wen
>
Looks ok. I've added Marty Plummer to Cc, he was recently proposing
patches for Hi3520, which I think is closely related to this one.
20 matches
Mail list logo