Re: [PATCH 1/4] HID: multitouch: add MT_QUIRK_NOT_SEEN_MEANS_UP to MT_CLS_WIN_8 quirks

2018-08-09 Thread Joey Pabalinas
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:53:19AM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > NACK on this. > If the Surface has a buggy firmware, we should handle it as a special > case, not as a common failure. > Also, I am not sure this quirk is compatible with Win 8 specification. > Last, we now have a timeout for

Re: [PATCH 1/4] HID: multitouch: add MT_QUIRK_NOT_SEEN_MEANS_UP to MT_CLS_WIN_8 quirks

2018-08-09 Thread Joey Pabalinas
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 09:53:19AM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > NACK on this. > If the Surface has a buggy firmware, we should handle it as a special > case, not as a common failure. > Also, I am not sure this quirk is compatible with Win 8 specification. > Last, we now have a timeout for

Re: [PATCH 1/4] HID: multitouch: add MT_QUIRK_NOT_SEEN_MEANS_UP to MT_CLS_WIN_8 quirks

2018-07-03 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Joey Pabalinas wrote: > The firmware found in the touch screen of the Surface Pro 3 is slightly > buggy and occasionally doesn't send lift off reports for contacts; add > MT_QUIRK_NOT_SEEN_MEANS_UP to .quirks to compensate for the missed > reports. > >

Re: [PATCH 1/4] HID: multitouch: add MT_QUIRK_NOT_SEEN_MEANS_UP to MT_CLS_WIN_8 quirks

2018-07-03 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Joey Pabalinas wrote: > The firmware found in the touch screen of the Surface Pro 3 is slightly > buggy and occasionally doesn't send lift off reports for contacts; add > MT_QUIRK_NOT_SEEN_MEANS_UP to .quirks to compensate for the missed > reports. > >