Re: [PATCH 1/4] MODSIGN: do not load mok when secure boot disabled

2017-11-30 Thread joeyli
Hi James, First, thank you for reviewing and comment! On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 07:51:03AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 22:11 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote: > > The mok can not be trusted when the secure boot is disabled. Which > > means that the kernel embedded certificate

Re: [PATCH 1/4] MODSIGN: do not load mok when secure boot disabled

2017-11-30 Thread joeyli
Hi James, First, thank you for reviewing and comment! On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 07:51:03AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 22:11 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote: > > The mok can not be trusted when the secure boot is disabled. Which > > means that the kernel embedded certificate

Re: [PATCH 1/4] MODSIGN: do not load mok when secure boot disabled

2017-11-30 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 22:11 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote: > The mok can not be trusted when the secure boot is disabled. Which > means that the kernel embedded certificate is the only trusted key. > > Due to db/dbx are authenticated variables, they needs manufacturer's > KEK for update. So db/dbx

Re: [PATCH 1/4] MODSIGN: do not load mok when secure boot disabled

2017-11-30 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 22:11 +0800, Lee, Chun-Yi wrote: > The mok can not be trusted when the secure boot is disabled. Which > means that the kernel embedded certificate is the only trusted key. > > Due to db/dbx are authenticated variables, they needs manufacturer's > KEK for update. So db/dbx