On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:29:39PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 10:35 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 22:57 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> > > > Firstly, this kind of
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 10:35 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 22:57 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> > > Firstly, this kind of type check doesn't work. It does something similar
> > > as following:
> >
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 10:35 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 22:57 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
Firstly, this kind of type check doesn't work. It does something similar
as following:
void *
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 04:29:39PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.01.2013, 10:35 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 22:57 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
Firstly, this kind of type check
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 22:57 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> > Firstly, this kind of type check doesn't work. It does something similar
> > as following:
> > void * __dummy = NULL;
> > __buf = __dummy;
> >
> > __dummy
Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 22:57 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
> Firstly, this kind of type check doesn't work. It does something similar
> as following:
> void * __dummy = NULL;
> __buf = __dummy;
>
> __dummy is defined as void *. Thus it will not trigger warnings as
> expected.
>
>
Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 22:57 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
Firstly, this kind of type check doesn't work. It does something similar
as following:
void * __dummy = NULL;
__buf = __dummy;
__dummy is defined as void *. Thus it will not trigger warnings as
expected.
Second,
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:51:04PM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2013, 22:57 +0800 schrieb Yuanhan Liu:
Firstly, this kind of type check doesn't work. It does something similar
as following:
void * __dummy = NULL;
__buf = __dummy;
__dummy is defined as
8 matches
Mail list logo