-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2015 03:06 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:30:41AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:14:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2015 03:06 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:30:41AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:14:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:30:41AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:14:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > > -BEGIN PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2015 03:30 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> I prefer a new series too. Now whether you or me take the patches,
> I don't mind either way :-)
I'll make it, no problem.
> Also I wonder how this feature is going to be enabled. Will it be
>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:14:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM,
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:14:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM, Frederic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2015 03:30 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
I prefer a new series too. Now whether you or me take the patches,
I don't mind either way :-)
I'll make it, no problem.
Also I wonder how this feature is going to be enabled. Will it be
On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 09:30:41AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:14:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> >
> > > Just a few things then:
> > >
> > > 1) In
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > Just a few things then:
> >
> > 1) In this case rename context_tracking_user_enter/exit() to
> > context_tracking_enter()
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Just a few things then:
>
> 1) In this case rename context_tracking_user_enter/exit() to
> context_tracking_enter() and context_tracking_exit(), since it's
> not anymore about user only but about
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:51:56PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/06/2015 01:23 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: On
> > 02/06/2015 12:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 01:23 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: On
> 02/06/2015 12:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com
wrote:
>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/06/2015 12:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> From: Rik van Riel
> >>
> >> Add the expected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 12:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Rik van Riel
>>
>> Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to
>> context_tracking_user_enter and
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel
>
> Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to context_tracking_user_enter
> and context_tracking_user_exit, allowing the same functions to not just
> track kernel <> user space switching, but also kernel <>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:15:57AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2015 00:55, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> From: Rik van Riel
> >>
> >> Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to context_tracking_user_enter
> >>
On 06/02/2015 00:55, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
>> From: Rik van Riel
>>
>> Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to context_tracking_user_enter
>> and context_tracking_user_exit, allowing the same functions to not just
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 01:23 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: On
02/06/2015 12:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com
wrote:
From: Rik van
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:51:56PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 01:23 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: On
02/06/2015 12:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Just a few things then:
1) In this case rename context_tracking_user_enter/exit() to
context_tracking_enter() and context_tracking_exit(), since it's
not anymore about user only but about any
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:34:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Just a few things then:
1) In this case rename
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 10:53:34PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 06:15 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
Just a few things then:
1) In this case rename context_tracking_user_enter/exit() to
context_tracking_enter() and
On 06/02/2015 00:55, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to context_tracking_user_enter
and context_tracking_user_exit, allowing the same functions to not just
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 11:15:57AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 06/02/2015 00:55, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to context_tracking_user_enter
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to context_tracking_user_enter
and context_tracking_user_exit, allowing the same functions to not just
track kernel user space switching, but also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 12:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to
context_tracking_user_enter and
On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 01:20:21PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 12:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Add the expected
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel
>
> Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to context_tracking_user_enter
> and context_tracking_user_exit, allowing the same functions to not just
> track kernel <> user space switching, but also kernel <>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:23:48PM -0500, r...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Rik van Riel r...@redhat.com
Add the expected ctx_state as a parameter to context_tracking_user_enter
and context_tracking_user_exit, allowing the same functions to not just
track kernel user space switching, but also
30 matches
Mail list logo