On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:15:15PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> [PATCH] sysfs: implement sysfs_dirent active reference and immediate
> disconnect
For some reason, this doesn't apply on top of your patches:
Applying patch
sysfs-implement-sysfs_dirent-active-reference-and-immediate-disconnect.patch
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:18:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:15:15PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > [PATCH] sysfs: implement sysfs_dirent active reference and immediate
> > disconnect
>
> For some reason, this doesn't apply on top of your patches:
>
> Applying patch
>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:15:15PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
[PATCH] sysfs: implement sysfs_dirent active reference and immediate
disconnect
For some reason, this doesn't apply on top of your patches:
Applying patch
sysfs-implement-sysfs_dirent-active-reference-and-immediate-disconnect.patch
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:18:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 01:15:15PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
[PATCH] sysfs: implement sysfs_dirent active reference and immediate
disconnect
For some reason, this doesn't apply on top of your patches:
Applying patch
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:13:59 +0900,
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this patch fix the problem?
>
> Index: work/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> ===
> --- work.orig/fs/sysfs/dir.c 2007-04-11 19:12:02.0 +0900
> +++
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 06:26:42PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > ===
> > [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> > 2.6.21-rc6-ge666c753-dirty #54
> >
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>> ===
>> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
>> 2.6.21-rc6-ge666c753-dirty #54
>> ---
>> kslowcrw/64 is trying to acquire
Hello,
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> ===
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.21-rc6-ge666c753-dirty #54
> ---
> kslowcrw/64 is trying to acquire lock:
>
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:15:15 +0900,
Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cornelia, this should fix the problem you reported. It's caused by
> doing up_write() on sysfs_dirent which is used for readdir cursor
> which is not deactivated before being released.
> release_sysfs_dirent() is udpated
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 13:15:15 +0900,
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cornelia, this should fix the problem you reported. It's caused by
doing up_write() on sysfs_dirent which is used for readdir cursor
which is not deactivated before being released.
release_sysfs_dirent() is udpated such
Hello,
Cornelia Huck wrote:
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.21-rc6-ge666c753-dirty #54
---
kslowcrw/64 is trying to acquire lock:
(sch-reg_mutex){--..},
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Cornelia Huck wrote:
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.21-rc6-ge666c753-dirty #54
---
kslowcrw/64 is trying to acquire lock:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 06:26:42PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Cornelia Huck wrote:
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.21-rc6-ge666c753-dirty #54
---
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:13:59 +0900,
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this patch fix the problem?
Index: work/fs/sysfs/dir.c
===
--- work.orig/fs/sysfs/dir.c 2007-04-11 19:12:02.0 +0900
+++ work/fs/sysfs/dir.c
14 matches
Mail list logo