On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:45:34 PM Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On 05/21/2013 07:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> ..
> >>> + mem->state = to_state;
> >>> + if (to_state == MEM_ONLINE)
> >>> + mem->last_online = online_type;
> >>
> >> Why do we need to
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:45:34 PM Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Rafael,
On 05/21/2013 07:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
..
+ mem-state = to_state;
+ if (to_state == MEM_ONLINE)
+ mem-last_online = online_type;
Why do we need to remember last online
Hi Rafael,
On 05/21/2013 07:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
..
+ mem->state = to_state;
+ if (to_state == MEM_ONLINE)
+ mem->last_online = online_type;
Why do we need to remember last online type ?
And as far as I know, we can obtain
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 02:37:53 PM Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Please see below.
>
> On 05/04/2013 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> ..
> > static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(memory_chain);
> > @@ -278,33 +283,64 @@ static int __memory_block_change_state(s
> > {
> > int ret =
Hi Rafael,
Please see below.
On 05/04/2013 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
..
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(memory_chain);
@@ -278,33 +283,64 @@ static int __memory_block_change_state(s
{
int ret = 0;
- if (mem->state != from_state_req) {
- ret =
Hi Rafael,
Please see below.
On 05/04/2013 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
..
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(memory_chain);
@@ -278,33 +283,64 @@ static int __memory_block_change_state(s
{
int ret = 0;
- if (mem-state != from_state_req) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 02:37:53 PM Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Please see below.
On 05/04/2013 07:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
..
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(memory_chain);
@@ -278,33 +283,64 @@ static int __memory_block_change_state(s
{
int ret = 0;
- if
Hi Rafael,
On 05/21/2013 07:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
..
+ mem-state = to_state;
+ if (to_state == MEM_ONLINE)
+ mem-last_online = online_type;
Why do we need to remember last online type ?
And as far as I know, we can obtain which
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 13:53 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 06:37:34 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 02:24 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 05:59:16 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
:
> > > Moreover, it'd be better to do it in
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 06:37:34 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 02:24 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 05:59:16 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 06:37:34 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 02:24 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 05:59:16 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 13:53 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 06:37:34 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 02:24 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 05:59:16 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
:
Moreover, it'd be better to do it in
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 02:24 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 05:59:16 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J.
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 05:59:16 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J.
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> >
> > :
> >
> > > Updated patch is
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
>
> :
>
> > Updated patch is appended for completness.
>
> Yes, this updated patch solved the locking issue.
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
:
> Updated patch is appended for completness.
Yes, this updated patch solved the locking issue.
> > > > A more general issue is that there are now two memory
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:59:05AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, May 06, 2013 06:28:12 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > From:
Hi,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:59:05AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, May 06, 2013 06:28:12 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> > On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> > > Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks
Hi,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:59:05AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, May 06, 2013 06:28:12 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Introduce .offline() and
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 02:59:05AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, May 06, 2013 06:28:12 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J.
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
:
Updated patch is appended for completness.
Yes, this updated patch solved the locking issue.
A more general issue is that there are now two memory offlining
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
:
Updated patch is appended for completness.
Yes, this updated patch solved the locking issue.
A
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
:
Updated patch is appended for
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 12:59:45 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 14:11 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 05:59:16 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 01:17 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 04:45:40 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 00:10 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 03:03:49 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Monday, May 06, 2013 06:28:12 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys
> > that will allow the generic device_offline() and
On Monday, May 06, 2013 10:20:44 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys
> > that will allow the generic device_offline() and
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys
> that will allow the generic device_offline() and device_online()
> to be used with device objects representing memory blocks. That,
>
Hi,
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys
> that will allow the generic device_offline() and device_online()
> to be used with device objects representing memory blocks.
Hi,
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys
that will allow the generic device_offline() and device_online()
to be used with device objects
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys
that will allow the generic device_offline() and device_online()
to be used with device objects representing
On Monday, May 06, 2013 10:20:44 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys
that will allow the generic device_offline()
On Monday, May 06, 2013 06:28:12 PM Vasilis Liaskovitis wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 01:21:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com
Introduce .offline() and .online() callbacks for memory_subsys
that will allow the generic
37 matches
Mail list logo
