* Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> > That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't
> >> > mean do exactly what you say without arguing.
> >>
> >> Your
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't
mean do exactly what you say
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't
>> > mean do exactly what you say without arguing.
>>
>> Your reply to my routine feedback was obtuse,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't
> > mean do exactly what you say without arguing.
>
> Your reply to my routine feedback was obtuse, argumentative and needlessly
> confrontative - that's not
* Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> >>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > * Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > * Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >> >
>>
* Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >
>> > * Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> >
>> >> We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of making it 5
>> >> (1000 / (3600 / 18)), let's
* Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >
> >> We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of making it 5
> >> (1000 / (3600 / 18)), let's make it 4, so the user can see two blinks
> >> per second.
> >
> >
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Felipe Contreras wrote:
>
>> We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of making it 5
>> (1000 / (3600 / 18)), let's make it 4, so the user can see two blinks
>> per second.
>
> Please use the customary changelog style we
* Felipe Contreras wrote:
> We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of making it 5
> (1000 / (3600 / 18)), let's make it 4, so the user can see two blinks
> per second.
Please use the customary changelog style we use in the kernel:
" Current code does (A), this has a
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of making it 5
(1000 / (3600 / 18)), let's make it 4, so the user can see two blinks
per second.
Please use the customary changelog style we use in the kernel:
Current code does
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of making it 5
(1000 / (3600 / 18)), let's make it 4, so the user can see two blinks
per second.
Please use the
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
We want to calculate the blinks per second, and instead of making it 5
(1000 / (3600 / 18)), let's make it 4,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
We want to calculate the blinks per
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Ingo
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
* Felipe Contreras
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't
mean do exactly what you say without arguing.
Your reply to my routine feedback was obtuse, argumentative and needlessly
confrontative - that's not
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
That's exactly what I did. Addressing feedback constructively doesn't
mean do exactly what you say without arguing.
Your reply to my routine feedback was obtuse,
20 matches
Mail list logo