Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 26 April 2015 at 13:01, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: >> On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The >> > fact that we have a binding document at all is a

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 26-04-15 13:01, Mark Brown wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote: No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug. And how do

Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote: > > No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The > > fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug. > And how do you get spidev if nothing binds to

Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > >> +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file >> + { > > No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The > fact that we have a binding

Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file > + { No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug. signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 26-04-15 13:01, Mark Brown wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The fact that we have a binding document at all is a

Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file +spi2 { No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug. signature.asc Description:

Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file +spi2 { No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The fact that we have a

Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug. And how do you get spidev if

Re: [PATCH 2/3] spidev: Add DT binding example.

2015-04-26 Thread Michal Suchanek
On 26 April 2015 at 13:01, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote: On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The fact that we have a