On 26 April 2015 at 13:01, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
>> > fact that we have a binding document at all is a
Hi,
On 26-04-15 13:01, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote:
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug.
And how do
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote:
> > No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
> > fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug.
> And how do you get spidev if nothing binds to
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>
>> +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file
>> + {
>
> No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
> fact that we have a binding
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> +A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file
> + {
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Hi,
On 26-04-15 13:01, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have a binding document at all is a
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
+A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file
+spi2 {
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug.
signature.asc
Description:
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
+A spidev example for devicetree binding in a board dts file
+spi2 {
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have a
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have a binding document at all is a bug.
And how do you get spidev if
On 26 April 2015 at 13:01, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:54:36PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
On 26 April 2015 at 12:32, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote:
No, this is broken - nothing should ever bind to spidev as spidev. The
fact that we have a
10 matches
Mail list logo