On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:41 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Laight
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:37:41 +
>
>> From: Lucas Tanure
>>> Sent: 30 January 2016 13:18
>>> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
>>> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
>>
>> One might ask why?
>
> We have
From: David Laight
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:37:41 +
> From: Lucas Tanure
>> Sent: 30 January 2016 13:18
>> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
>> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
>
> One might ask why?
We have consistently done this, and consistency is enough of an
argument.
From: Lucas Tanure
> Sent: 30 January 2016 13:18
> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
One might ask why?
The kernel types are older, but the uintX_t ones are now part
of the C standard.
Writing header files (eg for ioctl buffers) that have to be
parsed
From: David Laight
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:37:41 +
> From: Lucas Tanure
>> Sent: 30 January 2016 13:18
>> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
>> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
>
> One might ask why?
We have consistently done this, and consistency is
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 11:41 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Laight
> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 16:37:41 +
>
>> From: Lucas Tanure
>>> Sent: 30 January 2016 13:18
>>> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
>>> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over
From: Lucas Tanure
> Sent: 30 January 2016 13:18
> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
One might ask why?
The kernel types are older, but the uintX_t ones are now part
of the C standard.
Writing header files (eg for ioctl buffers) that have to be
parsed
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 09:51 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:05 -0200, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> > > On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> > > > As suggested by
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 09:51 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:05 -0200, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > > > As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> > > > CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:05 -0200, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> >> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
> >
> > You might have noticed we have literally hundreds of
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:05 -0200, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > > As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> > > CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
> >
> > You might have noticed we have literally hundreds
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
>> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
>
> You might have noticed we have literally hundreds of them spread over 100
> files in the netfilter code. We'll gradually
On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
You might have noticed we have literally hundreds of them spread over 100
files in the netfilter code. We'll gradually change them when the code is
touched anyways.
>
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:05 -0200, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> >> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> >> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
> >
> > You might have noticed we have
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 09:51 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:05 -0200, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > > > As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> > > > CHECK: Prefer kernel
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 09:51 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:05 -0200, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> > > On 30.01, Lucas Tanure
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:05 -0200, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> > > As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> > > CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
> >
> > You might have noticed we have
On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
You might have noticed we have literally hundreds of them spread over 100
files in the netfilter code. We'll gradually change them when the code is
touched anyways.
>
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 30.01, Lucas Tanure wrote:
>> As suggested by checkpatch.pl:
>> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'uX' over 'uintX_t'
>
> You might have noticed we have literally hundreds of them spread over 100
> files in the netfilter code.
18 matches
Mail list logo