Hi Peter,
Thank you for the clarification.
On 08/19/2013 04:00 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:47:47AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>
>> I have a few comments and clarification to seek.
>>
>> 1. How are you
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:47:47AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> I have a few comments and clarification to seek.
>
> 1. How are you ensuring from this patch that sgs->group_power does not
> change over the course of load
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:47:47AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I have a few comments and clarification to seek.
1. How are you ensuring from this patch that sgs-group_power does not
change over the course of load balancing?
Hi Peter,
Thank you for the clarification.
On 08/19/2013 04:00 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:47:47AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I have a few comments and clarification to seek.
1. How are you ensuring from
Hi Peter,
On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I have a few comments and clarification to seek.
1. How are you ensuring from this patch that sgs->group_power does not
change over the course of load balancing?
The only path to update_group_power() where sg->sgp->power gets
updated,
Hi Peter,
On 08/16/2013 03:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I have a few comments and clarification to seek.
1. How are you ensuring from this patch that sgs-group_power does not
change over the course of load balancing?
The only path to update_group_power() where sg-sgp-power gets
updated, is
6 matches
Mail list logo