On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:17 PM, wrote:
> Use common clock framework version of clock
> drivers/clk/shmobile/clk-emev2.c
> instead of sh-clkfwk version
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-emev2.c
>
> kzm9d(without -reference) still uses sh-clkfwk version.
>
> Because two of that framework can not
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:17 PM, takas...@ops.dti.ne.jp wrote:
Use common clock framework version of clock
drivers/clk/shmobile/clk-emev2.c
instead of sh-clkfwk version
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-emev2.c
kzm9d(without -reference) still uses sh-clkfwk version.
Because two of that
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:17:03PM +0900, takas...@ops.dti.ne.jp wrote:
> Use common clock framework version of clock
> drivers/clk/shmobile/clk-emev2.c
> instead of sh-clkfwk version
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-emev2.c
>
> kzm9d(without -reference) still uses sh-clkfwk version.
>
> Because
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:17:03PM +0900, takas...@ops.dti.ne.jp wrote:
Use common clock framework version of clock
drivers/clk/shmobile/clk-emev2.c
instead of sh-clkfwk version
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-emev2.c
kzm9d(without -reference) still uses sh-clkfwk version.
Because two of
4 matches
Mail list logo