On Monday 23 April 2007 13:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 23 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> >
> > > Isn't B44 already behind a WIRELESS or IEEE80211 or similar option that
> > > can't be selected on s390?
> >
> > No, the option can be found in drivers/net/Kconfig under menu "Ethern
On Monday 23 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> > Isn't B44 already behind a WIRELESS or IEEE80211 or similar option that
> > can't be selected on s390?
>
> No, the option can be found in drivers/net/Kconfig under menu "Ethernet
> (10 or 100Mbit)".
Ah, I was confusing it with b43.
Depend
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:22 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The current Kconfig code does not check all select statements if they
> > can be enabled before allowing the config option that does the select.
> > So the rule for using select statements is that the depends line of the
> > config option
On Monday 23 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> The current Kconfig code does not check all select statements if they
> can be enabled before allowing the config option that does the select.
> So the rule for using select statements is that the depends line of the
> config option that selects
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 11:46 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > > No, this doesn't look right. There are other devices that come with
> > > SiliconBackplane but are not PCI or PCMCIA style devices.
> >
> > Yes, Michael already told me about that. The current solution is to use
> > !S390, could we use
On Sunday 22 April 2007 09:53, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 01:19 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > diff -urpN linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/Kconfig
> > > linux-2.6-patched/drivers/ssb/Kconfig
> > > --- linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-04-19 15:24:40.0
> > > +0200
> >
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 01:19 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > diff -urpN linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/Kconfig
> > linux-2.6-patched/drivers/ssb/Kconfig
> > --- linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-04-19 15:24:40.0 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6-patched/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-04-19
> > 15:55:4
On Friday 20 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>
> From: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Make the "Sonics Silicon Backplane" menu dependent on the two buses
> it can be found on.
> Goes on top of git-wireless.patch.
>
> Cc: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: John W. Linville
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 22:45 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> This is wrong. SSB does not depend on PCI or PCMCIA.
> SSB can (and does) stay very well on its own feet and
> can be the main system bus.
> Most Linksys WRT routers work that way. They have no
> PCI bus, but a SSB bus instead.
>
> Neverth
On Friday 20 April 2007 13:35, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> From: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Make the "Sonics Silicon Backplane" menu dependent on the two buses
> it can be found on.
> Goes on top of git-wireless.patch.
>
> Cc: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: John W. Linvi
10 matches
Mail list logo