Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-23 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 23 April 2007 13:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 23 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > > > > Isn't B44 already behind a WIRELESS or IEEE80211 or similar option that > > > can't be selected on s390? > > > > No, the option can be found in drivers/net/Kconfig under menu "Ethern

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-23 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 23 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > > Isn't B44 already behind a WIRELESS or IEEE80211 or similar option that > > can't be selected on s390? > > No, the option can be found in drivers/net/Kconfig under menu "Ethernet > (10 or 100Mbit)". Ah, I was confusing it with b43. Depend

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-23 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:22 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The current Kconfig code does not check all select statements if they > > can be enabled before allowing the config option that does the select. > > So the rule for using select statements is that the depends line of the > > config option

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-23 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 23 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > The current Kconfig code does not check all select statements if they > can be enabled before allowing the config option that does the select. > So the rule for using select statements is that the depends line of the > config option that selects

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-23 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 11:46 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > No, this doesn't look right. There are other devices that come with > > > SiliconBackplane but are not PCI or PCMCIA style devices. > > > > Yes, Michael already told me about that. The current solution is to use > > !S390, could we use

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-22 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 22 April 2007 09:53, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 01:19 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > diff -urpN linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/Kconfig > > > linux-2.6-patched/drivers/ssb/Kconfig > > > --- linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-04-19 15:24:40.0 > > > +0200 > >

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-22 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 01:19 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > diff -urpN linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/Kconfig > > linux-2.6-patched/drivers/ssb/Kconfig > > --- linux-2.6/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-04-19 15:24:40.0 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6-patched/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-04-19 > > 15:55:4

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-21 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 20 April 2007, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > From: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Make the "Sonics Silicon Backplane" menu dependent on the two buses > it can be found on. > Goes on top of git-wireless.patch. > > Cc: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: John W. Linville

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-20 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 22:45 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > This is wrong. SSB does not depend on PCI or PCMCIA. > SSB can (and does) stay very well on its own feet and > can be the main system bus. > Most Linksys WRT routers work that way. They have no > PCI bus, but a SSB bus instead. > > Neverth

Re: [PATCH 7/8] Kconfig: silicon backplane dependency.

2007-04-20 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 20 April 2007 13:35, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > From: Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Make the "Sonics Silicon Backplane" menu dependent on the two buses > it can be found on. > Goes on top of git-wireless.patch. > > Cc: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: John W. Linvi