> -Original Message-
> From: Zoltan Kiss
> Sent: 13 January 2014 00:20
> To: Paul Durrant; Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Davies
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] xen-netback:
On 09/01/14 09:20, Paul Durrant wrote:
We are adding the skb to vif->rx_queue even when
xenvif_rx_ring_slots_available(vif, min_slots_needed) said there is no
space for that. Or am I missing something? Paul?
That's correct. Part of the flow control improvement was to get rid of needless
packet
> -Original Message-
> From: Zoltan Kiss
> Sent: 08 January 2014 21:34
> To: Ian Campbell; Wei Liu; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Jonathan Davies
> Cc: Zoltan Kiss; Paul Durrant
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-nex
I just realized when answering Ma's mail that this doesn't cause the
desired effect after Paul's flow control improvement: starting the queue
doesn't drop the packets which cannot fit the ring. Which in fact might
be not good. We are adding the skb to vif->rx_queue even when
xenvif_rx_ring_slot
4 matches
Mail list logo
