On Tuesday 16 October 2007 14:57, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> make_page_uptodate() is most hideous part I have run into.
> >> It has to know details about other layers to now what not
> >> to stomp. I think my incorrect simplification of this is what
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> make_page_uptodate() is most hideous part I have run into.
>> It has to know details about other layers to now what not
>> to stomp. I think my incorrect simplification of this is what messed
>> things up, last round.
>
> Not really, it's just named
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 13:14, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Monday 15 October 2007 19:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 15 October 2007 19:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> > On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> > > Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Monday 15 October 2007 19:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Nick Piggin:
>>> > On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> > > Andrew, this
Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 15 October 2007 19:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Nick Piggin:
>> > On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> > > Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
>>
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > > Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
> > > unmaintained, so decided
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Nick Piggin:
> > On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > > Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
> > > unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
> > unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch to you :-).
> > I have CCed Ted, who did
Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Nick Piggin:
> On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
> > unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch to you :-).
> > I have CCed Ted, who did work on the code in the 90s.
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
> unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch to you :-).
> I have CCed Ted, who did work on the code in the 90s. I found no current
> email address of Chad Page.
This
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch to you :-).
I have CCed Ted, who did work on the code in the 90s. I found no current
email address of Chad Page.
This really
Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Nick Piggin:
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch to you :-).
I have CCed Ted, who did work on the code in the 90s. I found
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch to you :-).
I have CCed Ted, who did work on the
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Nick Piggin:
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
unmaintained, so decided to sent the patch to you
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
unmaintained, so decided to sent the
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Nick Piggin:
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a bit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:05, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Nick Piggin:
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Andrew, this is a resend of a
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Andrew, this is a resend of a bugfix patch. Ramdisk seems a
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 13:14, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 15 October 2007 19:16, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:06:19 +1000 Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday 15 October 2007 18:28, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make_page_uptodate() is most hideous part I have run into.
It has to know details about other layers to now what not
to stomp. I think my incorrect simplification of this is what messed
things up, last round.
Not really, it's just named funny. That's
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 14:57, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
make_page_uptodate() is most hideous part I have run into.
It has to know details about other layers to now what not
to stomp. I think my incorrect simplification of this is what messed
22 matches
Mail list logo