Hi Arnd,
On 09/07/13 22:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> For DT case, At the moment I think callbacks at MACH level is one
>> > possible solution. But am open for any discussions.
> Ok, so a PHY driver might not be the best place to put this, but it's
> one option, since the PHY driver already has to
Hi Arnd,
On 09/07/13 22:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
For DT case, At the moment I think callbacks at MACH level is one
possible solution. But am open for any discussions.
Ok, so a PHY driver might not be the best place to put this, but it's
one option, since the PHY driver already has to know
On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> On 09/07/13 08:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > No, you should be using generic interfaces to do the things you need.
> >
> > I believe what you are missing is an ethernet phy driver that is specific
> > to your SoC.
> It looks interesting way to
On 09/07/13 08:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> No, you should be using generic interfaces to do the things you need.
>
> I believe what you are missing is an ethernet phy driver that is specific
> to your SoC.
It looks interesting way to solve the issue.
Did you mean "Ethernet PHY"?
Ethernet PHY is
On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> stmmac (aka "dwmac" a synopsis IP) driver is integrated in to kernel
> sometime in 2.6 series I think :-), and Is used by more than 4 platforms
> in 3.10 kernel. The driver is more generic than it sounds.
> So adding properties/hooks specific
Thanks Arnd,
On 09/07/13 00:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 08 July 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla
>>
>> This patch series fixes 2 configuration issues and adds ethernet support to
>> STiH415, STiH416 based B2000, B2020 boards.
>
> Hi Srini,
>
> You really
On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
On 09/07/13 08:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
No, you should be using generic interfaces to do the things you need.
I believe what you are missing is an ethernet phy driver that is specific
to your SoC.
It looks interesting way to solve the
Thanks Arnd,
On 09/07/13 00:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 08 July 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandaga...@st.com
This patch series fixes 2 configuration issues and adds ethernet support to
STiH415, STiH416 based B2000, B2020 boards.
Hi Srini,
On Tuesday 09 July 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
stmmac (aka dwmac a synopsis IP) driver is integrated in to kernel
sometime in 2.6 series I think :-), and Is used by more than 4 platforms
in 3.10 kernel. The driver is more generic than it sounds.
So adding properties/hooks specific to
On 09/07/13 08:56, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
No, you should be using generic interfaces to do the things you need.
I believe what you are missing is an ethernet phy driver that is specific
to your SoC.
It looks interesting way to solve the issue.
Did you mean Ethernet PHY?
Ethernet PHY is not
On Monday 08 July 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
> From: Srinivas Kandagatla
>
> This patch series fixes 2 configuration issues and adds ethernet support to
> STiH415, STiH416 based B2000, B2020 boards.
> With this patchset B2000 and B2020 can have basic ethernet support in
> MII and RGMII
On Monday 08 July 2013, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandaga...@st.com
This patch series fixes 2 configuration issues and adds ethernet support to
STiH415, STiH416 based B2000, B2020 boards.
With this patchset B2000 and B2020 can have basic ethernet support
12 matches
Mail list logo
