Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:56 AM Frank Rowand wrote: > > Hi Saravana, > > On 5/24/19 9:04 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:40 PM Frank Rowand wrote: > >> > >> Hi Saranova, > >> > >> I'll try to address the other portions of this email that I > >> in my previous replies. >

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

Hi Saravana, On 5/24/19 9:04 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:40 PM Frank Rowand wrote: >> >> Hi Saranova, >> >> I'll try to address the other portions of this email that I >> in my previous replies. >> >> >> On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: >>> On Fri, May 24,

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

Hello Saravana, On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: ... > Having functional dependencies explicitly called out in DT and > automatically added before the devices are probed, provides the > following benefits: ... > - Supplier devices like clock providers, regulators providers, etc > need

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

Sending again because email client somehow reverted to HTML. Frank, Rob, Mark, Gentle reminder. I've replied to your emails spread across the different patches in the series. Hoping they address your questions and concerns. Please let me know what you think. Thanks, Saravana On Wed, May 29,

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:40 PM Frank Rowand wrote: > > Hi Saranova, > > I'll try to address the other portions of this email that I > in my previous replies. > > > On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand > > wrote: > >> > >> On 5/23/19 6:01

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

Hi Saranova, I'll try to address the other portions of this email that I in my previous replies. On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote: >> >> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: >>> Add a generic "depends-on" property that

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:52 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:01:11PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory > > functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the > > devices are created

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

Ugh... mobile app is sending HTML emails. Replying again. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:25 PM Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 5/24/19 5:22 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > >> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 5/23/19 6:01

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On 5/24/19 5:22 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: >> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote: >>> >>> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > < snip > > >>> Another flaw with this method is that existing device trees >>> will be broken after

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote: >> >> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: < snip > >> Another flaw with this method is that existing device trees >> will be broken after the kernel is modified, because existing >> device

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

Hi Saravana, On 5/24/19 2:53 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote: >> >> On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: < snip > > > -Saravana > There were several different topics in your email. I am going to do separate replies for different topics

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:49 AM Frank Rowand wrote: > > On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory > > functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the > > devices are created (but before they are probed)

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

Before I address all the comments, a friendly reminder: Whatever solution we come up with needs to work on a system with loadable modules and shouldn't depend on userspace for correctness. On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 6:04 AM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:01 PM Saravana Kannan

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On 5/23/19 6:01 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory > functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the > devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at this > "depends-on" property. > > This property

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 8:01 PM Saravana Kannan wrote: > > Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory > functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the > devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at this > "depends-on" property. The

Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] Solve postboot supplier cleanup and optimize probe ordering

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 06:01:11PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Add a generic "depends-on" property that allows specifying mandatory > functional dependencies between devices. Add device-links after the > devices are created (but before they are probed) by looking at this > "depends-on"