On 03/08/2018 03:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:29:48PM -0800, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
On 03/08/2018 12:54 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 13:41 -0800 schrieb sathyanarayanan
kuppuswamy :
On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
So I
On 03/08/2018 03:43 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:29:48PM -0800, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
On 03/08/2018 12:54 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 13:41 -0800 schrieb sathyanarayanan
kuppuswamy :
On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
So I
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:29:48PM -0800, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2018 12:54 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 13:41 -0800 schrieb sathyanarayanan
> > kuppuswamy :
> > > On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > So I don't see why your
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:29:48PM -0800, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2018 12:54 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 13:41 -0800 schrieb sathyanarayanan
> > kuppuswamy :
> > > On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > So I don't see why your
On 03/08/2018 12:54 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 13:41 -0800 schrieb sathyanarayanan
kuppuswamy :
On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
So I don't see why your check is needed, what other code path would ever
call this function in a way that the bounds check
On 03/08/2018 12:54 AM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 13:41 -0800 schrieb sathyanarayanan
kuppuswamy :
On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
So I don't see why your check is needed, what other code path would ever
call this function in a way that the bounds check
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:41:51PM -0800, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
>
>
> On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:23:56PM -0800,
> > sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
> > >
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:41:51PM -0800, sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy wrote:
>
>
> On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:23:56PM -0800,
> > sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
> > >
> > >
> > > In
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 13:41 -0800 schrieb sathyanarayanan
kuppuswamy :
>
> On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > So I don't see why your check is needed, what other code path would ever
> > call this function in a way that the bounds check would be needed?
> void
Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2018, 13:41 -0800 schrieb sathyanarayanan
kuppuswamy :
>
> On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > So I don't see why your check is needed, what other code path would ever
> > call this function in a way that the bounds check would be needed?
> void
On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:23:56PM -0800,
sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
In usb_serial_generic_submit_read_urb() function we are accessing the
On 03/07/2018 12:58 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:23:56PM -0800,
sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
In usb_serial_generic_submit_read_urb() function we are accessing the
port->read_urbs array without any boundry checks. This
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:23:56PM -0800,
sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>
> In usb_serial_generic_submit_read_urb() function we are accessing the
> port->read_urbs array without any boundry
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:23:56PM -0800,
sathyanarayanan.kuppusw...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
>
> In usb_serial_generic_submit_read_urb() function we are accessing the
> port->read_urbs array without any boundry checks. This might lead to
> kernel panic when
14 matches
Mail list logo