* Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Plus, one more advantage of using char/short/int/long is that when building a
> 32-bit kernel long will be a 32-bit type. Thus, all the aritmetic would be
> naturally done with variables of the appropriate width. Perhaps I could
* Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Plus, one more advantage of using char/short/int/long is that when building a
> 32-bit kernel long will be a 32-bit type. Thus, all the aritmetic would be
> naturally done with variables of the appropriate width. Perhaps I could use
> u8/u16/u32/long? It looks white
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:51:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > >
> > > > + /*
>
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 11:17:49AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:51:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > >
> > > > + /*
> > > > +* -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such
* Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:51:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> > >
* Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:51:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> > > + * in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the RIP of the
> > > +
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > * Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> > > + * in 64-bit mode
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > * Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >
> > > + /*
> > > + * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> > > + * in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:51:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > +* -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> > +* in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the RIP of the
>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 09:51:08AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > +* -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> > +* in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the RIP of the
> > +* following instruction.
> > +
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > +* -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> > +* in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the RIP of the
> > +* following
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ricardo Neri wrote:
>
> > + /*
> > +* -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> > +* in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the RIP of the
> > +* following instruction.
> > +*/
> > + if
* Ricardo Neri wrote:
> + /*
> + * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> + * in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the RIP of the
> + * following instruction.
> + */
> + if (*regoff ==
* Ricardo Neri wrote:
> + /*
> + * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset. In such a case,
> + * in 64-bit mode the effective address relative to the RIP of the
> + * following instruction.
> + */
> + if (*regoff == -EDOM) {
> + if
14 matches
Mail list logo