Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hi Steve.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:25:04AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Does creating the whole new netdevice is a too big overhead, or is it
considered bad idea?
I think its too big overhead, and pretty invasive on the low level cxgb3
driver. I
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hi Steve.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:25:04AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Does creating the whole new netdevice is a too big overhead, or is it
considered bad idea?
I think its too big overhead, and pretty invasive on the low level cxgb3
driver. I
Hi Steve.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:25:04AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Does creating the whole new netdevice is a too big overhead, or is it
> >considered bad idea?
>
> I think its too big overhead, and pretty invasive on the low level cxgb3
> driver. I think having a
Hi Steve.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 10:25:04AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Does creating the whole new netdevice is a too big overhead, or is it
considered bad idea?
I think its too big overhead, and pretty invasive on the low level cxgb3
driver. I think having a device in
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:09:06AM -0700, Sean Hefty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>>+addr = kmalloc(sizeof *addr, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>
> >>As a small nitpick: this wants to be sizeof(struct in_ifaddr)
>
> See chapter 14 of CodingStyle document. kmalloc(sizeof *addr... is correct.
Come on, do
+addr = kmalloc(sizeof *addr, GFP_KERNEL);
As a small nitpick: this wants to be sizeof(struct in_ifaddr)
See chapter 14 of CodingStyle document. kmalloc(sizeof *addr... is correct.
- Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hi Steve.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:56:46AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The iWARP driver must translate all listens on address 0.0.0.0 to the
set of rdma-only ip addresses for the device in question. This prevents
incoming connect requests to the
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
Hi Steve.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:56:46AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The iWARP driver must translate all listens on address 0.0.0.0 to the
set of rdma-only ip addresses for the device in question. This prevents
incoming connect requests to the
+addr = kmalloc(sizeof *addr, GFP_KERNEL);
As a small nitpick: this wants to be sizeof(struct in_ifaddr)
See chapter 14 of CodingStyle document. kmalloc(sizeof *addr... is correct.
- Sean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 09:09:06AM -0700, Sean Hefty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
+addr = kmalloc(sizeof *addr, GFP_KERNEL);
As a small nitpick: this wants to be sizeof(struct in_ifaddr)
See chapter 14 of CodingStyle document. kmalloc(sizeof *addr... is correct.
Come on, do not start a
Hi Steve.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:56:46AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >>The iWARP driver must translate all listens on address 0.0.0.0 to the
> >>set of rdma-only ip addresses for the device in question. This prevents
> >>incoming connect requests to the TCP ipaddresses
Hi Steve.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 10:56:46AM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The iWARP driver must translate all listens on address 0.0.0.0 to the
set of rdma-only ip addresses for the device in question. This prevents
incoming connect requests to the TCP ipaddresses from going
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:16:17PM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
Version 2:
- added a per-device mutex for the address and listening endpoints lists.
- wait for all replies if
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:16:17PM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
iw_cxgb3: Support iwarp-only interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
Version 2:
- added a per-device mutex for the address and listening endpoints lists.
- wait for all replies if sending
> Maybe you should automatically create an alias each time new interface
> is added so that admin would not care about proper aliases?
I agree that makes much more sense from a user interface point of
view. Unfortunately an alias without an address doesn't make sense,
so there doesn't seem to
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:16:17PM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
>
> Version 2:
>
> - added a per-device mutex for the address and listening endpoints lists.
>
> - wait for all replies if sending multiple
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:16:17PM -0500, Steve Wise ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
iw_cxgb3: Support iwarp-only interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts.
Version 2:
- added a per-device mutex for the address and listening endpoints lists.
- wait for all replies if sending multiple
Maybe you should automatically create an alias each time new interface
is added so that admin would not care about proper aliases?
I agree that makes much more sense from a user interface point of
view. Unfortunately an alias without an address doesn't make sense,
so there doesn't seem to be
18 matches
Mail list logo
